From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] mlx4 XDP TX refactor Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 12:44:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20161030.124440.1962738096545317259.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1477579924-32737-1-git-send-email-tariqt@mellanox.com> <0773c58c-293d-38be-9844-e8f92d135aec@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: tariqt@mellanox.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, eranbe@mellanox.com To: ttoukan.linux@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:33290 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932604AbcJ3Qoo (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Oct 2016 12:44:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <0773c58c-293d-38be-9844-e8f92d135aec@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Tariq Toukan Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 18:21:26 +0200 > Hi Dave, > > This series makes Brenden's fix unneeded: > 958b3d396d7f ("net/mlx4_en: fixup xdp tx irq to match rx") > > The fix got into net, but yet to be in net-next. > > Should I wait with this series and send a re-spin, with a revert of > the fix, once it gets into net-next? I'm working on merging net into net-next right now, once that is pushed out you can respin.