From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/11] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add port duplex setter Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 10:44:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20161101094440.GC2802@lunn.ch> References: <20161101032023.32762-1-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> <20161101032023.32762-9-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@savoirfairelinux.com, "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli To: Vivien Didelot Return-path: Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:59670 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1168313AbcKAJom (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2016 05:44:42 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161101032023.32762-9-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > int (*port_set_link)(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port, int link); > + > + /* Port's MAC duplex mode > + * > + * Use DUPLEX_HALF or DUPLEX_FULL to force half or full duplex, or > + * DUPLEX_UNKNOWN for normal duplex detection. > + */ > + int (*port_set_duplex)(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port, int dup); Hi Vivien Again, i think DUPLEX_UNFORCED, or DUPLEX_AUTO would be better. Andrew