From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Allan W. Nielsen" Subject: Re: [lkp] [net] af1fee9821: BUG:spinlock_trylock_failure_on_UP_on_CPU Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 10:55:32 +0100 Message-ID: <20161107095532.GD16599@microsemi.com> References: <20161107022628.GA21529@yexl-desktop> <20161107093148.GA27001@lunn.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Cc: kernel test robot , Raju Lakkaraju , "David S. Miller" , LKML , , To: Andrew Lunn Return-path: Received: from mail-dm3nam03on0042.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.41.42]:58113 "EHLO NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752312AbcKGJzr (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2016 04:55:47 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161107093148.GA27001@lunn.ch> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, I'm quite surprised too. I asked Raju to see if he can re-produce, and then try again with the microsemi_phy disabled and see it that makes a difference. If Raju gets stuck on this, then I will try to help our during the after-noon. /Allan On 07/11/16 10:31, Andrew Lunn wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL > > > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:26:28AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > > FYI, we noticed the following commit: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git master > > commit af1fee98219992ba2c12441a447719652ed7e983 ("net: phy: Add support for Microsemi VSC 8530/40 Fast Ethernet PHY") > > Humm, interesting. I've no idea how this patch can trigger such a > warning. The USB gadget does not have an Ethernet PHY, let alone a > Microsemi 8530/40 Fast Ethernet PHY this patch adds. > > However, it seems nicely documented how to reproduce this. Allan, can > you setup such a system? Reproduce it, then revert the change and see > if it still happens. > > Andrew