From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] Start adding support for mv88e6390
 family
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 22:39:09 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20161113.223909.2192862536004096356.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1478832823-31471-1-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch>
        <20161113.004859.749028544003333521.davem@davemloft.net>
        <20161113202403.GB18258@lunn.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com
To: andrew@lunn.ch
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:52890 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1753169AbcKNDjO (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 13 Nov 2016 22:39:14 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20161113202403.GB18258@lunn.ch>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 21:24:03 +0100

> What seems to be the issue is you said you have accepted:
> 
> [PATCH net-next 0/2] Fixes for port refactoring
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=147880114928996&w=1
> 
> Yet i don't see these in net-next. And i based this patchset on a tree
> which included the fixes. Hence they are not applying.
> 
> Have the fixes really been accepted?

Accepted but not pushed out properly, sorry.

This should be sorted out now.