From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dept-GELinuxNICDev@cavium.com, rasesh.mody@cavium.com,
harish.patil@cavium.com, frank@undermydesk.org,
jsr@dex.edzone.net, pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de, jroedel@suse.de,
dyoung@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] bnx2: Hard reset bnx2 chip at probe stage
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 12:10:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161113041017.GE15325@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACKFLimGyhzPY=0ehHGG7e0w58i7XfuTmAcsrjMwzc3weGNCjA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Michael,
On 11/11/16 at 09:37am, Michael Chan wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 11/11/16 at 09:46pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> >> Hi bnx2 experts,
> >>
> >> In commit 3e1be7a ("bnx2: Reset device during driver initialization"),
> >> firmware requesting code was moved from open stage to probe stage.
> >> The reason is in kdump kernel hardware iommu need device be reset in
> >> driver probe stage, otherwise those in-flight DMA from 1st kernel
> >> will continue going and look up into the newly created io-page tables.
> >> So we need reset device to stop in-flight DMA as early as possibe.
> >>
> >> But with commit 3e1be7a merged, people reported their bnx2 driver init
> >> failed because of failed firmware loading. After discussion, it's found
> >> that they built bnx2 driver into kernel, and that makes probe function
> >> bnx2_init_one be called in do_initcalls(). But at this time the initramfs
> >> has not been uncompressed yet and mounted, kernel can't detect firmware.
> >>
> >> So there's only one way to cover both. Try to hard reset the bnx2 device
> >> at probe stage, without involving firmware issues. I tried to add function
> >> bnx2_hard_reset_chip() to do this and it's only called in kdump kernel.
> >> The thing is I am not quite familiar with bnx2 chip spec, just abstract
> >> code from bnx2_reset_chip, the testing result is good.
> >
> > Here I changed to send BNX2_MISC_COMMAND_HD_RESET in BNX2_CHIP_5709
> > case.
> >
>
> From my old 5709 Documentation:
>
> Bit 6 HD_RESET: Writing this bit as 1 will cause the chip to do a
> hard reset like bit 5 except the sticky bits in the PCI function are
> not reset.
>
> Bit 5 POR_RESET: Writing this bit as 1 will cause the chip to do an
> internal reset exactly like a power-up reset. There is no protection
> for this request and it may cause any current PCI cycle to lock up.
> This reset is intended for use under manufacturing conditions only.
>
> So it sounds like doing HD_RESET can potentially cause a PCI bus lock up.
>
> Why not just disable DMA gracefully as done at the beginning of
> bnx2_reset_chip()?
Thanks for your suggestion.
If what I undertand is correct, you meant waiting for the current PCI
transaction to complete, right? I tried and it also works. I like this
idea, will repost v2. Please help check if it meets your thoughts.
Thanks
Baoquan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-13 4:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-11 13:46 [PATCH 0/2] bnx2: Hard reset bnx2 chip at probe stage Baoquan He
2016-11-11 13:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "bnx2: Reset device during driver initialization" Baoquan He
2016-11-11 13:51 ` Paul Menzel
2016-11-11 13:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] bnx2: Hard reset bnx2 chip at probe stage Baoquan He
2016-11-13 4:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] bnx2: Wait for in-flight DMA to complete " Baoquan He
2016-11-13 4:40 ` David Miller
2016-11-13 4:54 ` Baoquan He
2016-11-11 14:02 ` [PATCH 0/2] bnx2: Hard reset bnx2 chip " Baoquan He
2016-11-11 17:37 ` Michael Chan
2016-11-13 4:10 ` Baoquan He [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161113041017.GE15325@x1 \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=Dept-GELinuxNICDev@cavium.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=frank@undermydesk.org \
--cc=harish.patil@cavium.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=jsr@dex.edzone.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=rasesh.mody@cavium.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).