From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fengguang Wu Subject: Re: [LKP] [net] 2ab9fb18c4: kernel BUG at include/linux/skbuff.h:1935! Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 11:11:30 +0800 Message-ID: <20161114031130.yjb4anou24ede4ue@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> References: <5828fc09.rTUEnj6qw0eDHzYL%xiaolong.ye@intel.com> <1479088020.8455.41.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <20161114021420.GC31218@yexl-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: Eric Dumazet , Alexander Duyck , Willem de Bruijn , netdev , Alexei Starovoitov , Jojy Varghese , Tom Herbert , Yibin Yang , lkp@01.org, David Miller To: Ye Xiaolong Return-path: Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:52511 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932373AbcKNDLe (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Nov 2016 22:11:34 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161114021420.GC31218@yexl-desktop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: >>Hi guys. >> >>I took a look at the commit again and I do not see how this can happen. >> >>Are you sure patch was properly applied ? >> >>In particular, the following extract is obscure for me : >> >> >>> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux Eric-Dumazet/net-__skb_flow_dissect-must-cap-its-return-value/20161110-080839 >>> commit 2ab9fb18c46b91b16a0f0f329336d3be9fc32deb ("net: __skb_flow_dissect() must cap its return value") >>> > >Hi, > >The above two lines means 0day repo setup a new branch >"Eric-Dumazet/net-__skb_flow_dissect-must-cap-its-return-value/20161110-080839" >which is based on net/master, then applied you patch on top of it, >commit id is 2ab9fb18c46b91b16a0f0f329336d3be9fc32deb. Xiaolong, it may be more helpful to show the base tree where we apply the patch to. And the final url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/tree/Eric-Dumazet/net-__skb_flow_dissect-must-cap-its-return-value/20161110-080839 Thanks, Fengguang