From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
stephen@networkplumber.org, vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com,
andrew@lunn.ch, jiri@mellanox.com, idosch@mellanox.com,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC net-next 0/3] net: bridge: Allow CPU port configuration
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:09:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161121190925.14530-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi all,
This patch series allows using the bridge master interface to configure
an Ethernet switch port's CPU/management port with different VLAN attributes than
those of the bridge downstream ports/members.
Jiri, Ido, Andrew, Vivien, please review the impact on mlxsw and mv88e6xxx, I
tested this with b53 and a mockup DSA driver.
Open questions:
- if we have more than one bridge on top of a physical switch, the driver
should keep track of that and verify that we are not going to change
the CPU port VLAN attributes in a way that results in incompatible settings
to be applied
- if the default behavior is to have all VLANs associated with the CPU port
be ingressing/egressing tagged to the CPU, is this really useful?
Florian Fainelli (3):
net: bridge: Allow bridge master device to configure switch CPU port
net: dsa: Propagate VLAN add/del to CPU port(s)
net: dsa: b53: Remove CPU port specific VLAN programming
drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c | 22 ++++++--------------
net/bridge/br_vlan.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
net/dsa/slave.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
--
2.9.3
next reply other threads:[~2016-11-21 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-21 19:09 Florian Fainelli [this message]
2016-11-21 19:09 ` [RFC net-next 1/3] net: bridge: Allow bridge master device to configure switch CPU port Florian Fainelli
2016-11-22 15:46 ` Vivien Didelot
2016-11-24 1:49 ` Toshiaki Makita
2016-11-21 19:09 ` [RFC net-next 2/3] net: dsa: Propagate VLAN add/del to CPU port(s) Florian Fainelli
2016-11-22 16:50 ` Vivien Didelot
2016-11-28 4:30 ` Florian Fainelli
2016-11-21 19:09 ` [RFC net-next 3/3] net: dsa: b53: Remove CPU port specific VLAN programming Florian Fainelli
2016-11-22 12:49 ` [RFC net-next 0/3] net: bridge: Allow CPU port configuration Jiri Pirko
2016-11-22 15:29 ` Vivien Didelot
2016-11-22 17:41 ` Ido Schimmel
2016-11-22 17:48 ` Andrew Lunn
2016-11-22 22:08 ` Jiri Pirko
2016-11-23 0:24 ` Florian Fainelli
2016-11-23 8:21 ` Jiri Pirko
2016-11-22 17:56 ` Florian Fainelli
2016-11-23 13:48 ` Ido Schimmel
2016-12-01 20:21 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161121190925.14530-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).