From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/sched: act_pedit: limit negative offset Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:49:36 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20161128.004936.2064564176474656911.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20161127155815.10359-1-amir@vadai.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: amir@vadai.me, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jhs@mojatatu.com, ogerlitz@mellanox.com, hadarh@mellanox.com, jiri@mellanox.com To: xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:42508 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751623AbcK1Ftm (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:49:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Cong Wang Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 21:39:33 -0800 > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Amir Vadai wrote: >> Should not allow setting a negative offset that goes below the skb head. > ... >> diff --git a/net/sched/act_pedit.c b/net/sched/act_pedit.c >> index b54d56d4959b..e79e8a88f2d2 100644 >> --- a/net/sched/act_pedit.c >> +++ b/net/sched/act_pedit.c >> @@ -154,8 +154,11 @@ static int tcf_pedit(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a, >> } >> >> ptr = skb_header_pointer(skb, off + offset, 4, &_data); >> - if (!ptr) >> + if ((unsigned char *)ptr < skb->head) { > > > ptr returned could be &_data, which is on stack, so why this comparison > makes sense for this case? Indeed, this will definitely do the wrong thing when the on-stack area passed back to ptr.