From: Amir Vadai <amir@vadai.me>
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>,
Hadar Har-Zion <hadarh@mellanox.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 V3 3/3] tc/act_tunnel: Introduce ip tunnel action
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:57:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161201095715.GA28945@office.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161130154453.3394b3f2@griffin>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 03:44:53PM +0100, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:38:40 +0200, Amir Vadai wrote:
> > +The
> > +.I UNSET
> > +mode is optional - even without using it, the metadata information will be
> > +released automatically when packet processing will be finished.
> > +.IR UNSET
> > +function could be used in cases when traffic is forwarded between two tunnels,
> > +where the metadata from the first tunnel will be used for encapsulation done by
> > +the second tunnel.
>
> This looks good.
:)
>
> > +It must be used for offloaded filters, such that hardware drivers can
> > +realize they need to program the HW to do decapsulation.
>
> However, this is wrong. The hardware offloading must be transparent.
> The same configuration that works when processed in software must work
> in hardware if the hardware has the necessary capabilities. Requiring
> the user to alter the configuration to accommodate hardware
> peculiarities is not acceptable.
>
> Or maybe I'm misunderstanding what you mean here. In which case it's
> not documented properly :-)
You understood it correctly. We should not force the user to use the
'unset' operation for offloading only. I will remove it from the text
here.
>
> > +.IR SET
> > +mode requires the source and destination ip
> > +.I ADDRESS
> > +and the tunnel key id
> > +.I KEY_ID
> > +which will be used by the ip tunnel shared device to create the tunnel header. The
> > +.B tunnel_key
> > +action is useful only in combination with a
> > +.B mirred redirect
> > +action to a shared IP tunnel device which will use the metadata (for
> > +.I SET
> > +) and unset the metadata created by it (for
> > +.I UNSET
> > +).
> > +
> > +.SH OPTIONS
> > +.TP
> > +.B unset
> > +Decapsulation mode, no further arguments allowed. This function is not
> > +mandatory and might be used only in some specific use cases.
>
> This is NOT decapsulation. The packet is decapsulated at this point in
> any case, whether or not set/unset or whatever is used. These actions
> are only and solely about metadata associated with the packet. The
> actual encapsulation and decapsulation happens at the target netdevice.
>
> Calling this "decapsulation" is wrong. And if it's implemented as such
> in your hardware offloading, then it's doubly wrong as it doesn't match
> software processing and hence you must not do that and you must change
> that.
Got it. Bad wording by me - will fix it and make sure offloading will
realy be transparent to user.
>
> > +.TP
> > +.B set
> > +Encapsulation mode. Requires
>
> Likewise, this is not encapsulation. It just sets metadata.
ack
Thanks,
Amir
>
> Jiri
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-01 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-30 7:38 [PATCH iproute2 V3 0/3] tc: Support for ip tunnel metadata set/unset/classify Amir Vadai
2016-11-30 7:38 ` [PATCH iproute2 V3 1/3] libnetlink: Introduce rta_getattr_be*() Amir Vadai
2016-11-30 7:38 ` [PATCH iproute2 V3 2/3] tc/cls_flower: Classify packet in ip tunnels Amir Vadai
2016-11-30 7:38 ` [PATCH iproute2 V3 3/3] tc/act_tunnel: Introduce ip tunnel action Amir Vadai
2016-11-30 14:44 ` Jiri Benc
2016-12-01 9:57 ` Amir Vadai [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161201095715.GA28945@office.localdomain \
--to=amir@vadai.me \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hadarh@mellanox.com \
--cc=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).