netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Peter Klausler <pmk@google.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>,
	Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
	syzkaller@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 15:05:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161201150437-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480584880-48651-1-git-send-email-andreyknvl@google.com>

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 10:34:40AM +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> This patch changes tun.c to call netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx
> when a packet is received (if CONFIG_4KSTACKS is not enabled to avoid
> stack exhaustion). The difference between the two is that netif_rx queues
> the packet into the backlog, and netif_receive_skb proccesses the packet
> in the current context.
> 
> This patch is required for syzkaller [1] to collect coverage from packet
> receive paths, when a packet being received through tun (syzkaller collects
> coverage per process in the process context).
> 
> As mentioned by Eric this change also speeds up tun/tap. As measured by
> Peter it speeds up his closed-loop single-stream tap/OVS benchmark by
> about 23%, from 700k packets/second to 867k packets/second.
> 
> A similar patch was introduced back in 2010 [2, 3], but the author found
> out that the patch doesn't help with the task he had in mind (for cgroups
> to shape network traffic based on the original process) and decided not to
> go further with it. The main concern back then was about possible stack
> exhaustion with 4K stacks.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/google/syzkaller
> 
> [2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/thrd440.html#130570
> 
> [3] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg130570.html
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>

Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

> ---
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - incorporate Eric's note about speed improvements in commit description
> - use netif_receive_skb CONFIG_4KSTACKS is not enabled
> 
>  drivers/net/tun.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index 8093e39..d310b13 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -1304,7 +1304,13 @@ static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
>  	skb_probe_transport_header(skb, 0);
>  
>  	rxhash = skb_get_hash(skb);
> +#ifndef CONFIG_4KSTACKS
> +	local_bh_disable();
> +	netif_receive_skb(skb);
> +	local_bh_enable();
> +#else
>  	netif_rx_ni(skb);
> +#endif
>  
>  	stats = get_cpu_ptr(tun->pcpu_stats);
>  	u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->syncp);
> -- 
> 2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-12-01 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-01  9:34 [PATCH v2] tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx Andrey Konovalov
2016-12-01  9:39 ` Jason Wang
2016-12-01 13:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2016-12-01 19:43 ` David Miller
2016-12-07  3:21   ` Jason Wang
2016-12-07  3:25     ` David Miller
2016-12-07  3:39       ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161201150437-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kcc@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pmk@google.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=soheil@google.com \
    --cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).