From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: Re: [flamebait] xdp, well meaning but pointless
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 17:51:30 +0100
Message-ID: <20161201165130.GE17239@breakpoint.cc>
References: <20161201091108.GF26507@breakpoint.cc>
 <20161201145834.GA569@pox.localdomain>
 <20161201.111947.888676978252329124.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: tgraf@suug.ch, fw@strlen.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([146.0.238.67]:53254 "EHLO
        Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755845AbcLAQye (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:54:34 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161201.111947.888676978252329124.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> Saying that ntuple filters can handle the early drop use case doesn't
> take into consideration the nature of the tables (hundreds of
> thousands of "evil" IP addresses),

Thats not what I said.

But Ok, message received. I rest my case.