From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>,
Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qian Zhang <zhangqian-c@360.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] tipc: check minimum bearer MTU
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 18:52:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161201175251.GA18850@unicorn.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480608678.16599.94.camel@decadent.org.uk>
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:11:18PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 12:02 +0100, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> [...]
> > +/* check if device MTU is sufficient for tipc headers */
> > +static inline bool tipc_check_mtu(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int reserve)
> > +{
> > + if (dev->mtu >= TIPC_MIN_BEARER_MTU + reserve)
> > + return false;
> > + netdev_warn(dev, "MTU too low for tipc bearer\n");
> > + return true;
> > +}
> [...]
>
> The comment says "check if ... sufficient" but the return value
> indicates the opposite. Could you make these consistent?
Good point. I suppose renaming the function to e.g. tipc_mtu_bad() (and
rewording the commment accordingly) would also make the code more
readable without looking at the definition.
I'll wait for other comments and send v3 tomorrow.
> Other than that, this looks OK to me. I haven't tested any version as
> I don't know how to use TIPC.
I checked that the patch doesn't allow enabling a bearer on top of
device with insufficient MTU and it does for sufficient (100/128), both
in eth and udp case. I also checked that lowering MTU under 100 in eth
case disables attached bearer. I didn't run any deeper test like sending
an actual traffic but the patch shouldn't affect that.
Michal Kubecek
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-01 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-01 11:02 [PATCH net v2] tipc: check minimum bearer MTU Michal Kubecek
2016-12-01 16:11 ` Ben Hutchings
2016-12-01 17:52 ` Michal Kubecek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161201175251.GA18850@unicorn.suse.cz \
--to=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jon.maloy@ericsson.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ying.xue@windriver.com \
--cc=zhangqian-c@360.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).