From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] geneve: avoid use-after-free of skb->data
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 01:33:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161203003326.GA27610@bistromath.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161202.140925.1784959728501874377.davem@davemloft.net>
2016-12-02, 14:09:25 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
> Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 16:49:29 +0100
>
> > geneve{,6}_build_skb can end up doing a pskb_expand_head(), which
> > makes the ip_hdr(skb) reference we stashed earlier stale. Since it's
> > only needed as an argument to ip_tunnel_ecn_encap(), move this
> > directly in the function call.
> >
> > Fixes: 08399efc6319 ("geneve: ensure ECN info is handled properly in all tx/rx paths")
> > Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
>
> Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks.
>
> This bug happens so many times that I think it might be time for
> a debugging mode for pskb_expand_head() that unconditionally
> reallocates the skb->data buffer regardless of whether it's
> necessary or not and somehow unmaps the previous buffer to
> force a trap on stale pointers.
The problem with that is you'd need to enable the "debugging mode" in
all wrappers, so that they don't bypass the actual call to
pskb_expand_head(). And that still leaves all the direct calls to
pskb_expand_head() that are guarded by some kind of check (just two
random hits without even looking very hard:
net/core/pktgen.c:process_ipsec, net/ipv4/ip_gre.c:gre_fb_xmit).
Then I think we could just rely on KASAN (that's how I noticed this
bug).
> Better ideas welcome, of course :)
May not be better ;) but at least another idea:
I'd like to try something based on static analysis. We'd need a way to
tag cached pointers to skb->data (via ip_hdr() or whatever), and
propagate the notion that pskb_expand_head() makes these cached
pointers stale through layers of function calls. I don't know how
feasible this is with the tools we have.
--
Sabrina
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-03 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-02 15:49 [PATCH net] geneve: avoid use-after-free of skb->data Sabrina Dubroca
2016-12-02 18:33 ` John W. Linville
2016-12-02 19:09 ` David Miller
2016-12-03 0:33 ` Sabrina Dubroca [this message]
2016-12-04 4:11 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161203003326.GA27610@bistromath.localdomain \
--to=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).