From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Benc Subject: Re: Misalignment, MIPS, and ip_hdr(skb)->version Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 12:26:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20161209122650.36a1a8e8@griffin> References: <095cac5b-b757-6f4a-e699-8eedf9ed7221@stressinduktion.org> <87vauvhwdu.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Netdev , LKML , Hannes Frederic Sowa , WireGuard mailing list To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87vauvhwdu.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 07 Dec 2016 23:34:21 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > fwiw, i'm not convinced that "most protocols of the IETF follow this > mantra". we've had multiple discussions in different protocol groups > about shaving or bloating by a few bytes here or there in different > protocols, and i don't think anyone has brought up memory alignment as > an argument in any of the discussions i've followed. Which is sad. One would expect that this would be well understood for decades already. Jiri