From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 perf/core 0/7] Reuse libbpf from samples/bpf Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 12:09:07 -0300 Message-ID: <20161209150907.GM8257@kernel.org> References: <20161209024620.31660-1-joe@ovn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, wangnan0@huawei.com, ast@fb.com, daniel@iogearbox.net To: Joe Stringer Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161209024620.31660-1-joe@ovn.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Em Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 06:46:13PM -0800, Joe Stringer escreveu: > (Was "libbpf: Synchronize implementations") > > Update tools/lib/bpf to provide the remaining bpf wrapper pieces needed by the > samples/bpf/ code, then get rid of all of the duplicate BPF libraries in > samples/bpf/libbpf.[ch]. > > --- > v3: Add ack for first patch. > Split out second patch from v2 into separate changes for remaining diff. > Add patches to switch samples/bpf over to using tools/lib/. > v2: https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg135088.html > Don't shift non-bpf code into libbpf. > Drop the patch to synchronize ELF definitions with tc. > v1: https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg135088.html > First post. Thanks, applied after addressing the -I$(objtree) issue raised by Wang, - Arnaldo