* [PATCH RFC 1/2] bpf: add a longest prefix match trie map implementation
2016-12-14 15:43 [PATCH RFC 0/2] bpf: add longest prefix match map Daniel Mack
@ 2016-12-14 15:43 ` Daniel Mack
2016-12-14 15:43 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] bpf: Add tests for the lpm trie map Daniel Mack
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Mack @ 2016-12-14 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ast; +Cc: dh.herrmann, daniel, netdev, davem, Daniel Mack
This trie implements a longest prefix match algorithm that can be used
to match IP addresses to a stored set of ranges.
Internally, data is stored in an unbalanced trie of nodes that has a
maximum height of n, where n is the prefixlen the trie was created
with.
Tries may be created with prefix lengths that are multiples of 8, in
the range from 8 to 2048. The key used for lookup and update operations
is a struct bpf_lpm_trie_key, and the value is a uint64_t.
The code carries more information about the internal implementation.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>
Reviewed-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
---
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 7 +
kernel/bpf/Makefile | 2 +-
kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c | 491 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 499 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 0eb0e87..d564277 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -63,6 +63,12 @@ struct bpf_insn {
__s32 imm; /* signed immediate constant */
};
+/* Key of an a BPF_MAP_TYPE_LPM_TRIE entry */
+struct bpf_lpm_trie_key {
+ __u32 prefixlen; /* up to 32 for AF_INET, 128 for AF_INET6 */
+ __u8 data[0]; /* Arbitrary size */
+};
+
/* BPF syscall commands, see bpf(2) man-page for details. */
enum bpf_cmd {
BPF_MAP_CREATE,
@@ -89,6 +95,7 @@ enum bpf_map_type {
BPF_MAP_TYPE_CGROUP_ARRAY,
BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_HASH,
BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH,
+ BPF_MAP_TYPE_LPM_TRIE,
};
enum bpf_prog_type {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/Makefile b/kernel/bpf/Makefile
index 1276474..e1ce4f4 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/bpf/Makefile
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
obj-y := core.o
obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += syscall.o verifier.o inode.o helpers.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += hashtab.o arraymap.o percpu_freelist.o bpf_lru_list.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += hashtab.o arraymap.o percpu_freelist.o bpf_lru_list.o lpm_trie.o
ifeq ($(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS),y)
obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) += stackmap.o
endif
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cae759d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
@@ -0,0 +1,491 @@
+/*
+ * Longest prefix match list implementation
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2016 Daniel Mack
+ * Copyright (c) 2016 David Herrmann
+ *
+ * This file is subject to the terms and conditions of version 2 of the GNU
+ * General Public License. See the file COPYING in the main directory of the
+ * Linux distribution for more details.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
+#include <net/ipv6.h>
+
+/* Intermediate node */
+#define LPM_TREE_NODE_FLAG_IM BIT(0)
+
+struct lpm_trie_node;
+
+struct lpm_trie_node {
+ struct rcu_head rcu;
+ struct lpm_trie_node *child[2];
+ u32 prefixlen;
+ u32 flags;
+ u64 value;
+ u8 data[0];
+};
+
+struct lpm_trie {
+ struct bpf_map map;
+ struct lpm_trie_node *root;
+ size_t n_entries;
+ size_t max_prefixlen;
+ size_t data_size;
+ spinlock_t lock;
+};
+
+/*
+ * This trie implements a longest prefix match algorithm that can be used to
+ * match IP addresses to a stored set of ranges.
+ *
+ * Data stored in @data of struct bpf_lpm_key and struct lpm_trie_node is
+ * interpreted as big endian, so data[0] stores the most significant byte.
+ *
+ * Match ranges are internally stored in instances of struct lpm_trie_node
+ * which each contain their prefix length as well as two pointers that may
+ * lead to more nodes containing more specific matches. Each node also stores
+ * a value that is defined by and returned to userspace via the update_elem
+ * and lookup functions.
+ *
+ * For instance, let's start with a trie that was created with a prefix length
+ * of 32, so it can be used for IPv4 addresses, and one single element that
+ * matches 192.168.0.0/16. The data array would hence contain
+ * [0xc0, 0xa8, 0x00, 0x00] in big-endian notation. This documentation will
+ * stick to IP-address notation for readability though.
+ *
+ * As the trie is empty initially, the new node (1) will be places as root
+ * node, denoted as (R) in the example below. As there are no other node, both
+ * child pointers are %NULL.
+ *
+ * +----------------+
+ * | (1) (R) |
+ * | 192.168.0.0/16 |
+ * | value: 1 |
+ * | [0] [1] |
+ * +----------------+
+ *
+ * Next, let's add a new node (2) matching 192.168.0.0/24. As there is already
+ * a node with the same data and a smaller prefix (ie, a less specific one),
+ * node (2) will become a child of (1). In child index depends on the next bit
+ * that is outside of that (1) matches, and that bit is 0, so (2) will be
+ * child[0] of (1):
+ *
+ * +----------------+
+ * | (1) (R) |
+ * | 192.168.0.0/16 |
+ * | value: 1 |
+ * | [0] [1] |
+ * +----------------+
+ * |
+ * +----------------+
+ * | (2) |
+ * | 192.168.0.0/24 |
+ * | value: 2 |
+ * | [0] [1] |
+ * +----------------+
+ *
+ * The child[1] slot of (1) could be filled with another node which has bit #17
+ * (the next bit after the ones that (1) matches on) set to 1. For instance,
+ * 192.168.128.0/24:
+ *
+ * +----------------+
+ * | (1) (R) |
+ * | 192.168.0.0/16 |
+ * | value: 1 |
+ * | [0] [1] |
+ * +----------------+
+ * | |
+ * +----------------+ +------------------+
+ * | (2) | | (3) |
+ * | 192.168.0.0/24 | | 192.168.128.0/24 |
+ * | value: 2 | | value: 3 |
+ * | [0] [1] | | [0] [1] |
+ * +----------------+ +------------------+
+ *
+ * Let's add another node (4) to the game for 192.168.1.0/24. In order to place
+ * it, node (1) is looked at first, and because (4) of the semantics laid out
+ * above (bit #17 is 0), it would normally be attached to (1) as child[0].
+ * However, that slot is already allocated, so a new node is needed in between.
+ * That node is does not have a value attached to it and it will never be
+ * returned to users as result of a lookup. It is only there to differenciate
+ * the traversal further. It will get a prefix as wide as necessary to
+ * distinguish its two children:
+ *
+ * +----------------+
+ * | (1) (R) |
+ * | 192.168.0.0/16 |
+ * | value: 1 |
+ * | [0] [1] |
+ * +----------------+
+ * | |
+ * +----------------+ +------------------+
+ * | (4) (I) | | (3) |
+ * | 192.168.0.0/23 | | 192.168.128.0/24 |
+ * | value: --- | | value: 3 |
+ * | [0] [1] | | [0] [1] |
+ * +----------------+ +------------------+
+ * | |
+ * +----------------+ +----------------+
+ * | (2) | | (5) |
+ * | 192.168.0.0/24 | | 192.168.1.0/24 |
+ * | value: 2 | | value: 5 |
+ * | [0] [1] | | [0] [1] |
+ * +----------------+ +----------------+
+ *
+ * 192.168.1.1/32 would be a child of (5) etc.
+ *
+ * An intermediate node will be turned into a 'real' node on demand. In the
+ * example above, (4) would be re-used if 192.168.0.0/23 is added to the trie.
+ *
+ * A fully populated trie would have a height of 32 nodes, as the trie was
+ * created with a prefix length of 32.
+ *
+ * The lookup starts at the root node. If the current node matches and if there
+ * is a child that can be used to become more specific, the trie is traversed
+ * downwards. The last node in the traversal that is a non-intermediate one is
+ * returned.
+ */
+
+static inline int extract_bit(const u8 *data, size_t index)
+{
+ return !!(data[index / 8] & (1 << (7 - (index % 8))));
+}
+
+/**
+ * longest_prefix_match() - determine the longest prefix
+ * @trie: The trie to get internal sizes from
+ * @node: The node to operate on
+ * @key: The key to compare to @node
+ *
+ * Determine the longest prefix of @node that matches the bits in @key.
+ */
+static size_t longest_prefix_match(const struct lpm_trie *trie,
+ const struct lpm_trie_node *node,
+ const struct bpf_lpm_trie_key *key)
+{
+ size_t prefixlen = 0;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < trie->data_size; i++) {
+ size_t b;
+
+ b = 8 - fls(node->data[i] ^ key->data[i]);
+ prefixlen += b;
+
+ if (prefixlen >= node->prefixlen || prefixlen >= key->prefixlen)
+ return min(node->prefixlen, key->prefixlen);
+
+ if (b < 8)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return prefixlen;
+}
+
+/* Called from syscall or from eBPF program */
+static void *trie_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key)
+{
+ struct lpm_trie_node *node, *found = NULL;
+ struct bpf_lpm_trie_key *key = _key;
+ struct lpm_trie *trie =
+ container_of(map, struct lpm_trie, map);
+
+ /* Start walking the trie from the root node ... */
+
+ for (node = rcu_dereference(trie->root); node;) {
+ unsigned int next_bit;
+ size_t matchlen;
+
+ /*
+ * Determine the longest prefix of @node that matches @key.
+ * If it's the maximum possible prefix for this trie, we have
+ * an exact match and can return it directly.
+ */
+ matchlen = longest_prefix_match(trie, node, key);
+ if (matchlen == trie->max_prefixlen)
+ return &node->value;
+
+ /*
+ * If the number of bits that match is smaller than the prefix
+ * length of @node, bail out and return the node we have seen
+ * last in the traversal (ie, the parent).
+ */
+ if (matchlen < node->prefixlen)
+ break;
+
+ /*
+ * Consider this node as return candidate unless it is an
+ * artificially added intermediate one
+ */
+ if (!(node->flags & LPM_TREE_NODE_FLAG_IM))
+ found = node;
+
+ /*
+ * If the node match is fully satisfied, let's see if we can
+ * become more specific. Determine the next bit in the key and
+ * traverse down.
+ */
+ next_bit = extract_bit(key->data, node->prefixlen);
+ node = rcu_dereference(node->child[next_bit]);
+ }
+
+ return found ? &found->value : NULL;
+}
+
+static struct lpm_trie_node *lpm_trie_node_alloc(size_t data_size)
+{
+ return kmalloc(sizeof(struct lpm_trie_node) + data_size,
+ GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
+}
+
+/**
+ *_lpm_trie_find_target_node() - locate a spot to put a new node
+ * @trie: The trie to walk
+ * @key: The key to find a slot for
+ * @node_ret: Return variable for a node slot
+ *
+ * Find a slot to put a new node for @key, and return it in @node_ret.
+ *
+ * If the target location is an empty child of an existing node, or the
+ * root is unused, a pointer to that empty spot is returned in @node_ret
+ * and 0 is returned by the function.
+ *
+ * Otherwise, if a node is detected that conflicts with @key, that conflicting
+ * node is returned in @node_ret. The caller should then replace that node with
+ * an intermediate node. In this case, the longest prefix match between the
+ * existing node and @key is returned.
+ */
+static size_t find_target_node(struct lpm_trie *trie,
+ struct bpf_lpm_trie_key *key,
+ struct lpm_trie_node ***node_ret)
+{
+ struct lpm_trie_node **node = &trie->root;
+ size_t matchlen = 0;
+
+ while (*node) {
+ unsigned int next_bit;
+
+ matchlen = longest_prefix_match(trie, *node, key);
+
+ if ((*node)->prefixlen != matchlen ||
+ (*node)->prefixlen == key->prefixlen ||
+ (*node)->prefixlen == trie->max_prefixlen)
+ break;
+
+ next_bit = extract_bit(key->data, (*node)->prefixlen);
+ node = &(*node)->child[next_bit];
+ }
+
+ *node_ret = node;
+
+ return *node ? matchlen : 0;
+}
+
+/* Called from syscall or from eBPF program */
+static int trie_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map,
+ void *_key, void *value, u64 flags)
+{
+ struct lpm_trie *trie = container_of(map, struct lpm_trie, map);
+ struct lpm_trie_node **node, *im_node, *new_node = NULL;
+ struct bpf_lpm_trie_key *key = _key;
+ size_t matchlen;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (key->prefixlen > trie->max_prefixlen)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ spin_lock(&trie->lock);
+
+ /* Allocate and fill a new node */
+
+ if (trie->n_entries == trie->map.max_entries) {
+ ret = -ENOSPC;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ new_node = lpm_trie_node_alloc(trie->data_size);
+ if (!new_node) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ trie->n_entries++;
+ new_node->value = *(u64 *) value;
+ new_node->prefixlen = key->prefixlen;
+ new_node->flags = 0;
+ new_node->child[0] = NULL;
+ new_node->child[1] = NULL;
+ memcpy(new_node->data, key->data, trie->data_size);
+
+ /*
+ * Now find a place to attach the new node. find_target_node()
+ * either returned an empty slot (the root or an empty leaf), or the
+ * closest match, in which case an intermediate node has to be created
+ * and installed.
+ */
+ matchlen = find_target_node(trie, key, &node);
+ if (!*node) {
+ rcu_assign_pointer(*node, new_node);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If the node we got back as target already exists, replace it
+ * new_node, which already has the correct data array and value set.
+ * If the node that is replaced is an intermediate one, turn it into a
+ * 'real' node.
+ */
+ if ((*node)->prefixlen == matchlen) {
+ struct lpm_trie_node *tmp;
+
+ new_node->child[0] = (*node)->child[0];
+ new_node->child[1] = (*node)->child[1];
+
+ tmp = rcu_dereference(*node);
+ if (!(tmp->flags & LPM_TREE_NODE_FLAG_IM))
+ trie->n_entries--;
+
+ rcu_assign_pointer(*node, new_node);
+ kfree_rcu(tmp, rcu);
+
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If the new node matches the prefix completely, it must be an
+ * inserted as an ancestor. Simply insert it between @node and @*node.
+ */
+ if (matchlen == key->prefixlen) {
+ new_node->child[extract_bit((*node)->data, matchlen)] = *node;
+ rcu_assign_pointer(*node, new_node);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /* Create an intermediate node and place it inbetween */
+ im_node = lpm_trie_node_alloc(trie->data_size);
+ if (!im_node) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ im_node->prefixlen = matchlen;
+ im_node->flags |= LPM_TREE_NODE_FLAG_IM;
+ memcpy(im_node->data, (*node)->data, trie->data_size);
+
+ /* Now determine which child to install in which slot */
+ if (extract_bit(key->data, matchlen)) {
+ im_node->child[0] = *node;
+ im_node->child[1] = new_node;
+ } else {
+ im_node->child[0] = new_node;
+ im_node->child[1] = *node;
+ }
+
+ /* Finally, assign the intermediate node to the determined spot */
+ rcu_assign_pointer(*node, im_node);
+
+out:
+ if (ret) {
+ if (new_node)
+ trie->n_entries--;
+
+ kfree(new_node);
+ kfree(im_node);
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock(&trie->lock);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static struct bpf_map *trie_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
+{
+ struct lpm_trie *trie;
+
+ /* check sanity of attributes */
+ if (attr->max_entries == 0 || attr->map_flags ||
+ attr->key_size < sizeof(struct bpf_lpm_trie_key) + 1 ||
+ attr->key_size > sizeof(struct bpf_lpm_trie_key) + 256 ||
+ attr->value_size != sizeof(u64))
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+ trie = kzalloc(sizeof(*trie), GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
+ if (!trie)
+ return NULL;
+
+ /* copy mandatory map attributes */
+ trie->map.map_type = attr->map_type;
+ trie->map.key_size = attr->key_size;
+ trie->map.value_size = attr->value_size;
+ trie->map.max_entries = attr->max_entries;
+ trie->data_size = attr->key_size -
+ offsetof(struct bpf_lpm_trie_key, data);
+ trie->max_prefixlen = trie->data_size * 8;
+
+ spin_lock_init(&trie->lock);
+
+ return &trie->map;
+}
+
+static void trie_free(struct bpf_map *map)
+{
+ struct lpm_trie_node **node;
+ struct lpm_trie *trie =
+ container_of(map, struct lpm_trie, map);
+
+ spin_lock(&trie->lock);
+
+ /*
+ * Always start at the root and walk down to a node that has no
+ * children. Then free that node, nullify its parent pointer and
+ * start over.
+ */
+
+ for (;;) {
+ node = &trie->root;
+ if (!*node)
+ break;
+
+ for (;;) {
+ if ((*node)->child[0]) {
+ node = &(*node)->child[0];
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if ((*node)->child[1]) {
+ node = &(*node)->child[1];
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ kfree(*node);
+ *node = NULL;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock(&trie->lock);
+}
+
+static const struct bpf_map_ops trie_ops = {
+ .map_alloc = trie_alloc,
+ .map_free = trie_free,
+ .map_lookup_elem = trie_lookup_elem,
+ .map_update_elem = trie_update_elem,
+};
+
+static struct bpf_map_type_list trie_type __read_mostly = {
+ .ops = &trie_ops,
+ .type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_LPM_TRIE,
+};
+
+static int __init register_trie_map(void)
+{
+ bpf_register_map_type(&trie_type);
+ return 0;
+}
+late_initcall(register_trie_map);
--
2.9.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [PATCH RFC 2/2] bpf: Add tests for the lpm trie map
2016-12-14 15:43 [PATCH RFC 0/2] bpf: add longest prefix match map Daniel Mack
2016-12-14 15:43 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] bpf: add a longest prefix match trie map implementation Daniel Mack
@ 2016-12-14 15:43 ` Daniel Mack
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Mack @ 2016-12-14 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ast; +Cc: dh.herrmann, daniel, netdev, davem, Daniel Mack
From: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
The first part of this program runs randomized tests against the
lpm-bpf-map. It implements a "Trivial Longest Prefix Match" (tlpm)
based on simple, linear, single linked lists. The implementation
should be pretty straightforward.
Based on tlpm, this inserts randomized data into bpf-lpm-maps and
verifies the trie-based bpf-map implementation behaves the same way
as tlpm.
The second part uses 'real world' IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and tests
the trie with those.
Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 4 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c | 348 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 351 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore
index 071431b..d3b1c9b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
test_verifier
test_maps
test_lru_map
+test_lpm_map
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index 7a5f245..064a3e5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 -I../../../../usr/include
-test_objs = test_verifier test_maps test_lru_map
+test_objs = test_verifier test_maps test_lru_map test_lpm_map
-TEST_PROGS := test_verifier test_maps test_lru_map test_kmod.sh
+TEST_PROGS := test_verifier test_maps test_lru_map test_lpm_map test_kmod.sh
TEST_FILES := $(test_objs)
all: $(test_objs)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..08db750
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
@@ -0,0 +1,348 @@
+/*
+ * Randomized tests for eBPF longest-prefix-match maps
+ *
+ * This program runs randomized tests against the lpm-bpf-map. It implements a
+ * "Trivial Longest Prefix Match" (tlpm) based on simple, linear, singly linked
+ * lists. The implementation should be pretty straightforward.
+ *
+ * Based on tlpm, this inserts randomized data into bpf-lpm-maps and verifies
+ * the trie-based bpf-map implementation behaves the same way as tlpm.
+ */
+
+#include <assert.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <inttypes.h>
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <time.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <arpa/inet.h>
+
+#include "bpf_sys.h"
+#include "bpf_util.h"
+
+struct tlpm_node {
+ struct tlpm_node *next;
+ size_t n_bits;
+ uint8_t key[];
+};
+
+static struct tlpm_node *tlpm_add(struct tlpm_node *list,
+ const uint8_t *key,
+ size_t n_bits)
+{
+ struct tlpm_node *node;
+ size_t n;
+
+ /* add new entry with @key/@n_bits to @list and return new head */
+
+ n = (n_bits + 7) / 8;
+ node = malloc(sizeof(*node) + n);
+ assert(node);
+
+ node->next = list;
+ node->n_bits = n_bits;
+ memcpy(node->key, key, n);
+
+ return node;
+}
+
+static void tlpm_clear(struct tlpm_node *list)
+{
+ struct tlpm_node *node;
+
+ /* free all entries in @list */
+
+ while ((node = list)) {
+ list = list->next;
+ free(node);
+ }
+}
+
+static struct tlpm_node *tlpm_match(struct tlpm_node *list,
+ const uint8_t *key,
+ size_t n_bits)
+{
+ struct tlpm_node *best = NULL;
+ size_t i;
+
+ /*
+ * Perform longest prefix-match on @key/@n_bits. That is, iterate all
+ * entries and match each prefix against @key. Remember the "best"
+ * entry we find (i.e., the longest prefix that matches) and return it
+ * to the caller when done.
+ */
+
+ for ( ; list; list = list->next) {
+ for (i = 0; i < n_bits && i < list->n_bits; ++i) {
+ if ((key[i / 8] & (1 << (7 - i % 8))) !=
+ (list->key[i / 8] & (1 << (7 - i % 8))))
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (i >= list->n_bits) {
+ if (!best || i > best->n_bits)
+ best = list;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return best;
+}
+
+static void test_lpm_basic(void)
+{
+ struct tlpm_node *list = NULL, *t1, *t2;
+
+ /* very basic, static tests to verify tlpm works as expected */
+
+ assert(!tlpm_match(list, (uint8_t[]){ 0xff }, 8));
+
+ t1 = list = tlpm_add(list, (uint8_t[]){ 0xff }, 8);
+ assert(t1 == tlpm_match(list, (uint8_t[]){ 0xff }, 8));
+ assert(t1 == tlpm_match(list, (uint8_t[]){ 0xff, 0xff }, 16));
+ assert(t1 == tlpm_match(list, (uint8_t[]){ 0xff, 0x00 }, 16));
+ assert(!tlpm_match(list, (uint8_t[]){ 0x7f }, 8));
+ assert(!tlpm_match(list, (uint8_t[]){ 0xfe }, 8));
+ assert(!tlpm_match(list, (uint8_t[]){ 0xff }, 7));
+
+ t2 = list = tlpm_add(list, (uint8_t[]){ 0xff, 0xff }, 16);
+ assert(t1 == tlpm_match(list, (uint8_t[]){ 0xff }, 8));
+ assert(t2 == tlpm_match(list, (uint8_t[]){ 0xff, 0xff }, 16));
+ assert(t1 == tlpm_match(list, (uint8_t[]){ 0xff, 0xff }, 15));
+ assert(!tlpm_match(list, (uint8_t[]){ 0x7f, 0xff }, 16));
+
+ tlpm_clear(list);
+}
+
+static void test_lpm_order(void)
+{
+ struct tlpm_node *t1, *t2, *l1 = NULL, *l2 = NULL;
+ size_t i, j;
+
+ /*
+ * Verify the tlpm implementation works correctly regardless of the
+ * order of entries. Insert a random set of entries into @l1, and copy
+ * the same data in reverse order into @l2. Then verify a lookup of
+ * random keys will yield the same result in both sets.
+ */
+
+ for (i = 0; i < (1 << 12); ++i)
+ l1 = tlpm_add(l1, (uint8_t[]){
+ rand() % 0xff,
+ rand() % 0xff,
+ }, rand() % 16 + 1);
+
+ for (t1 = l1; t1; t1 = t1->next)
+ l2 = tlpm_add(l2, t1->key, t1->n_bits);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < (1 << 8); ++i) {
+ uint8_t key[] = { rand() % 0xff, rand() % 0xff };
+
+ t1 = tlpm_match(l1, key, 16);
+ t2 = tlpm_match(l2, key, 16);
+
+ assert(!t1 == !t2);
+ if (t1) {
+ assert(t1->n_bits == t2->n_bits);
+ for (j = 0; j < t1->n_bits; ++j)
+ assert((t1->key[j / 8] & (1 << (7 - j % 8))) ==
+ (t2->key[j / 8] & (1 << (7 - j % 8))));
+ }
+ }
+
+ tlpm_clear(l1);
+ tlpm_clear(l2);
+}
+
+static void test_lpm_map(void)
+{
+ size_t i, j, n_matches, n_nodes, n_lookups;
+ struct tlpm_node *t, *list = NULL;
+ struct bpf_lpm_trie_key *key;
+ uint8_t value[8] = {};
+ int r, map;
+
+ /*
+ * Compare behavior of tlpm vs. bpf-lpm. Create a randomized set of
+ * prefixes and insert it into both tlpm and bpf-lpm. Then run some
+ * randomized lookups and verify both maps return the same result.
+ */
+
+ n_matches = 0;
+ n_nodes = 1 << 8;
+ n_lookups = 1 << 16;
+
+ key = alloca(sizeof(*key) + 4);
+ memset(key, 0, sizeof(*key) + 4);
+
+ map = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_LPM_TRIE,
+ sizeof(*key) + 4,
+ sizeof(value),
+ 4096,
+ 0);
+ assert(map >= 0);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n_nodes; ++i) {
+ value[0] = rand() & 0xff;
+ value[1] = rand() & 0xff;
+ value[2] = rand() & 0xff;
+ value[3] = rand() & 0xff;
+ value[4] = rand() % 33;
+
+ list = tlpm_add(list, value, value[4]);
+
+ key->prefixlen = value[4];
+ memcpy(key->data, value, 4);
+ r = bpf_map_update(map, key, value, 0);
+ assert(!r);
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n_lookups; ++i) {
+ uint8_t data[] = {
+ rand() % 0xff,
+ rand() % 0xff,
+ rand() % 0xff,
+ rand() % 0xff
+ };
+
+ t = tlpm_match(list, data, 32);
+
+ key->prefixlen = 32;
+ memcpy(key->data, data, 4);
+ r = bpf_map_lookup(map, key, value);
+ assert(!r || errno == ENOENT);
+ assert(!t == !!r);
+
+ if (t) {
+ ++n_matches;
+ assert(t->n_bits == value[4]);
+ for (j = 0; j < t->n_bits; ++j)
+ assert((t->key[j / 8] & (1 << (7 - j % 8))) ==
+ (value[j / 8] & (1 << (7 - j % 8))));
+ }
+ }
+
+ close(map);
+ tlpm_clear(list);
+
+ /*
+ * With 255 random nodes in the map, we are pretty likely to match
+ * something on every lookup. For statistics, use this:
+ *
+ * printf(" nodes: %zu\n"
+ * "lookups: %zu\n"
+ * "matches: %zu\n", n_nodes, n_lookups, n_matches);
+ */
+}
+
+/* Test the implementation with some 'real world' examples */
+
+static void test_lpm_ipaddr(void)
+{
+ struct bpf_lpm_trie_key *key_ipv4;
+ struct bpf_lpm_trie_key *key_ipv6;
+ size_t key_size_ipv4;
+ size_t key_size_ipv6;
+ int map_fd_ipv4;
+ int map_fd_ipv6;
+ __u64 value;
+
+ key_size_ipv4 = sizeof(*key_ipv4) + sizeof(__u32);
+ key_size_ipv6 = sizeof(*key_ipv6) + sizeof(__u32) * 4;
+ key_ipv4 = alloca(key_size_ipv4);
+ key_ipv6 = alloca(key_size_ipv6);
+
+ map_fd_ipv4 = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_LPM_TRIE,
+ key_size_ipv4, sizeof(value),
+ 100, 0);
+ assert(map_fd_ipv4 >= 0);
+
+ map_fd_ipv6 = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_LPM_TRIE,
+ key_size_ipv6, sizeof(value),
+ 100, 0);
+ assert(map_fd_ipv6 >= 0);
+
+ /* Fill data some IPv4 and IPv6 address ranges */
+ value = 1;
+ key_ipv4->prefixlen = 16;
+ inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.0.0", key_ipv4->data);
+ assert(bpf_map_update(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value, 0) == 0);
+
+ value = 2;
+ key_ipv4->prefixlen = 24;
+ inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.0.0", key_ipv4->data);
+ assert(bpf_map_update(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value, 0) == 0);
+
+ value = 3;
+ key_ipv4->prefixlen = 24;
+ inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.128.0", key_ipv4->data);
+ assert(bpf_map_update(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value, 0) == 0);
+
+ value = 5;
+ key_ipv4->prefixlen = 24;
+ inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.1.0", key_ipv4->data);
+ assert(bpf_map_update(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value, 0) == 0);
+
+ value = 4;
+ key_ipv4->prefixlen = 23;
+ inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.0.0", key_ipv4->data);
+ assert(bpf_map_update(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value, 0) == 0);
+
+ value = 0xdeadbeef;
+ key_ipv6->prefixlen = 64;
+ inet_pton(AF_INET6, "2a00:1450:4001:814::200e", key_ipv6->data);
+ assert(bpf_map_update(map_fd_ipv6, key_ipv6, &value, 0) == 0);
+
+ /* Set tprefixlen to maximum for lookups */
+ key_ipv4->prefixlen = 32;
+ key_ipv6->prefixlen = 128;
+
+ /* Test some lookups that should come back with a value */
+ inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.128.23", key_ipv4->data);
+ assert(bpf_map_lookup(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value) == 0);
+ assert(value == 3);
+
+ inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.0.1", key_ipv4->data);
+ assert(bpf_map_lookup(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value) == 0);
+ assert(value == 2);
+
+ inet_pton(AF_INET6, "2a00:1450:4001:814::", key_ipv6->data);
+ assert(bpf_map_lookup(map_fd_ipv6, key_ipv6, &value) == 0);
+ assert(value == 0xdeadbeef);
+
+ inet_pton(AF_INET6, "2a00:1450:4001:814::1", key_ipv6->data);
+ assert(bpf_map_lookup(map_fd_ipv6, key_ipv6, &value) == 0);
+ assert(value == 0xdeadbeef);
+
+ /* Test some lookups that should not match any entry */
+ inet_pton(AF_INET, "10.0.0.1", key_ipv4->data);
+ assert(bpf_map_lookup(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value) == -1 &&
+ errno == ENOENT);
+
+ inet_pton(AF_INET, "11.11.11.11", key_ipv4->data);
+ assert(bpf_map_lookup(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value) == -1 &&
+ errno == ENOENT);
+
+ inet_pton(AF_INET6, "2a00:ffff::", key_ipv6->data);
+ assert(bpf_map_lookup(map_fd_ipv6, key_ipv6, &value) == -1 &&
+ errno == ENOENT);
+
+ close(map_fd_ipv4);
+ close(map_fd_ipv6);
+}
+
+int main(void)
+{
+ /* we want predictable, pseudo random tests */
+ srand(0xf00ba1);
+
+ test_lpm_basic();
+ test_lpm_order();
+ test_lpm_map();
+ test_lpm_ipaddr();
+
+ printf("test_lpm: OK\n");
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.9.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread