From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 22/27] sctp: add rfc6525 section 5.2.4 Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 11:32:13 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20170101.113213.663892510185061837.davem@davemloft.net> References: <470b9f2b5248e0c1870c501f262a1887be66509b.1483269426.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com> <201701012026.kWKIK4Hy%fengguang.wu@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lkp@intel.com, kbuild-all@01.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, marcelo.leitner@gmail.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com To: lucien.xin@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:37936 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932066AbdAAQcP (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Jan 2017 11:32:15 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Xin Long Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2017 21:26:47 +0800 > As only when the result is not performed, initial_tsn variables is > uninitialized, peer side would ignore this value, so here is also > safe. It doesn't matter if it is "safe" or not, you must fix all of the warnings reported by kbuild before your patches will be considered for applying.