From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [RFC 3/4] net-next: dsa: Add support for multiple cpu ports. Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 16:22:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20170104152219.GD5517@lunn.ch> References: <1483515484-21793-1-git-send-email-john@phrozen.org> <1483515484-21793-4-git-send-email-john@phrozen.org> <20170104140105.GL10768@lunn.ch> <5a5c86c6-7a19-8720-7772-3d2d5b2633c5@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: John Crispin , "David S. Miller" , Vivien Didelot , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Florian Fainelli Return-path: Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:42961 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751505AbdADPXE (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2017 10:23:04 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5a5c86c6-7a19-8720-7772-3d2d5b2633c5@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > I am actually in the process of cleaning up my patches that add > platform_data support to net/dsa/dsa2.c this time with an user, and > hopefully a couple more after that, but that maintains the existing > struct dsa_chip_data as-is, no new additions are required, and this > would be purely for non-DT enabled platforms anyway. Hi Florian I was hoping we could avoid this complexity. But if there is a real need, the platform cannot be converted to device tree, we can add it. Andrew