From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/2] tools: psock_lib: tighten conditions
 checked in sock_setfilter
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 17:49:34 -0500
Message-ID: <20170104224934.GC31756@oracle.com>
References: <cover.1483555162.git.sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
 <3aa068fa482f7cf5381957e9a3ea58550822d1d1.1483555162.git.sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
 <d3e75147-475a-823c-3530-5150dd24a63d@kernel.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        daniel@iogearbox.net, willemb@google.com, davem@davemloft.net
To: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:24654 "EHLO
        userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S934035AbdADWtx (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 4 Jan 2017 17:49:53 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d3e75147-475a-823c-3530-5150dd24a63d@kernel.org>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On (01/04/17 15:37), Shuah Khan wrote:
> Looks like you have to do v4 anyway, please make sure your comment
> block is one of the acceptable formats based on coding style:

I'm not sure about that.  I can just keep patch 2.

thanks,
--Sowmini