From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: dsa: make "label" property optional for dsa2 Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 23:20:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20170106222008.GC10626@lunn.ch> References: <20170106220043.21280-1-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> <20170106220043.21280-2-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@savoirfairelinux.com, "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli , Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= To: Vivien Didelot Return-path: Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:47779 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758492AbdAFWUQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jan 2017 17:20:16 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170106220043.21280-2-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > If one wants to rename an interface, udev rules can be used as usual. Hi Vivien Do you have some examples? A quick look at udevadm info suggests we can use ATTR{phys_port_id} and ATTR{phys_switch_id} Humm, it would be nice to know why the second switch has a phys_switch_id of 01000000. How is systemd naming them without udev rules? Andrew