From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [net PATCH] net: virtio: cap mtu when XDP programs are running Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 01:05:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20170110010531-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20170102223031.11541.28717.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810> <402027b4-58c7-aa1b-5079-74e31448f544@redhat.com> <586BD5D5.6020100@gmail.com> <1caf1ffc-0f46-067e-0f0d-a93b408b4ffd@redhat.com> <586D458F.5050705@gmail.com> <068f0116-b37e-eb44-8c60-1781a9d5255e@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: John Fastabend , john.r.fastabend@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, daniel@iogearbox.net To: Jason Wang Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58828 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750821AbdAIXF7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2017 18:05:59 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <068f0116-b37e-eb44-8c60-1781a9d5255e@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 11:09:14AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2017年01月05日 02:57, John Fastabend wrote: > > [...] > > > > > On 2017年01月04日 00:48, John Fastabend wrote: > > > > On 17-01-02 10:14 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > On 2017年01月03日 06:30, John Fastabend wrote: > > > > > > XDP programs can not consume multiple pages so we cap the MTU to > > > > > > avoid this case. Virtio-net however only checks the MTU at XDP > > > > > > program load and does not block MTU changes after the program > > > > > > has loaded. > > > > > > > > > > > > This patch sets/clears the max_mtu value at XDP load/unload time. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: John Fastabend > > > > > > --- > > [...] > > > > > > OK so this logic is a bit too simply. When it resets the max_mtu I guess it > > > > needs to read the mtu via > > > > > > > > virtio_cread16(vdev, ...) > > > > > > > > or we may break the negotiated mtu. > > > Yes, this is a problem (even use ETH_MAX_MTU). We may need a method to notify > > > the device about the mtu in this case which is not supported by virtio now. > > Note this is not really a XDP specific problem. The guest can change the MTU > > after init time even without XDP which I assume should ideally result in a > > notification if the MTU is negotiated. > > Yes, Michael, do you think we need add some mechanism to notify host about > MTU change in this case? > > Thanks Why does host care?