From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: switchdev: Avoid sleep in atomic with DSA Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 15:59:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20170111145934.GU22820@lunn.ch> References: <20170109194503.10713-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> <20170109204849.GA28310@splinter> <20170109211436.GB28310@splinter> <20170110120846.GC1827@nanopsycho> <20170110132506.GA4084@splinter.mtl.com> <20170110141807.GD1827@nanopsycho> <20170110160852.GA18050@splinter.mtl.com> <03ce7d38-7775-3cd7-d863-682316d949bf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ido Schimmel , Jiri Pirko , netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com To: Florian Fainelli Return-path: Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:55107 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S938050AbdAKO7h (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 09:59:37 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <03ce7d38-7775-3cd7-d863-682316d949bf@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Vivien, Andrew, are you aware of an use case where we have the HW > programmed with a superset of VLANs wrt. the SW bridge? I cannot think of any case with a superset. Subset yes, but not superset. Andrew