From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC net] ravb: do not use zero-length alighment DMA request Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:04:02 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20170112.110402.1123747824643306383.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1484229217-25585-1-git-send-email-horms+renesas@verge.net.au> <20170112.102102.2249793963798495642.davem@davemloft.net> <20170112154647.GA2329@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com, magnus.damm@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org To: horms@verge.net.au Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:51444 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750734AbdALQEE (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:04:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20170112154647.GA2329@verge.net.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Simon Horman Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:46:47 +0100 > What I now see is that a few lines further up there is: > > if (skb_put_padto(skb, ETH_ZLEN)) > goto drop; > > where ETH_ZLEN is 60. > > So I don't think we need to worry about skb->len being less than 60 and > this patch can be simplified to: > > if (len == 0) > len = 4; I'd say this might deserve a comment...