From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/1] net sched actions: Add support for user cookies Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 10:24:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20170117.102426.1738397298019104514.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1484488879-29560-2-git-send-email-jhs@emojatatu.com> <20170116.144644.977968311370245919.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jiri@mellanox.com, paulb@mellanox.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, simon.horman@netronome.com, mrv@mojatatu.com, hadarh@mellanox.com, ogerlitz@mellanox.com, roid@mellanox.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, daniel@iogearbox.net To: jhs@mojatatu.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:37186 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750855AbdAQPYa (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 10:24:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Jamal Hadi Salim Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 05:52:15 -0500 > Having said that: Is this rule really cast in stone?;-> > I have seen many other people (including myself) sneak in whitespace > changes and other trivialities in a general change. I thought the rule > was to not do such things for bug fixes. Sneaking patches that do things they shouldn't past me doesn't make it the new rule.