From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shyam Saini Subject: Re: [PATCH] qed: Replace memset with eth_zero_addr Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 09:03:05 +0530 Message-ID: <20170117033305.GB4055@mystictot> References: <1484592698-19747-1-git-send-email-mayhs11saini@gmail.com> <20170116.145819.115892553691222296.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Yuval.Mintz@cavium.com, Ariel.Elior@cavium.com, everest-linux-l2@cavium.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f194.google.com ([209.85.192.194]:32874 "EHLO mail-pf0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750917AbdAQDdQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2017 22:33:16 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f194.google.com with SMTP id e4so4905205pfg.0 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 19:33:11 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170116.145819.115892553691222296.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 02:58:19PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Shyam Saini > Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:21:38 +0530 > > > Use eth_zero_addr to assign zero address to the given address array > > instead of memset when the second argument in memset is address > > of zero. Also, it makes the code clearer > > > > Signed-off-by: Shyam Saini > > This patch does not apply cleanly to the net-next tree. I always send patches from linux-next tree and that caused this mistake I apologize for this. > Please state if you don't understand what that means instead of > submitting this patch over and over again against the wrong source > tree. Now sent from net-next tree Thanks a lot, Shyam