From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: marcelo.leitner@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 net-next 3/5] sctp: implement sender-side procedures for SSN/TSN Reset Request Parameter Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 18:47:01 -0200 Message-ID: <20170120204701.GW3781@localhost.localdomain> References: <20170120182521.GV3781@localhost.localdomain> <20170120.140034.1018095629148946810.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: lucien.xin@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, nhorman@tuxdriver.com, vyasevich@gmail.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40834 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753489AbdATUrX (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:47:23 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170120.140034.1018095629148946810.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 02:00:34PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 16:25:22 -0200 > > > I talked offline with Xin about this and we cannot do it this way. > > Unfortunatelly we will have to take the long road here, because then > > we may send data while sending the request, as the streams are not > > closed yet. We really need to close team, send the request, and > > re-open if the send fails. > > I am expecting another spin of this series, correct? Yes.