From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Make xfrm usable by 32-bit programs
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:47:27 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20170123.104727.1594805087752706376.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20170121000507.34381-1-cernekee@chromium.org>
        <20170123093517.GM3541@gauss.secunet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: cernekee@chromium.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
        paul@paul-moore.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, eparis@parisplace.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, fw@strlen.de, fan.du@windriver.com,
        dianders@chromium.org, dtor@chromium.org
To: steffen.klassert@secunet.com
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170123093517.GM3541@gauss.secunet.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:35:17 +0100

> So this creates new incompatibilities what is another argument against
> this approach. If you really need this, try to implement a full compat
> layer. I think this is the only sane solution for this.

A full compat layer is the only reasonable solution to this problem.