From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
To: Jingju Hou <houjingj@marvell.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mvneta: implement .set_wol and .get_wol
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:58:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170123105816.3400334b@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1485139388-11003-1-git-send-email-houjingj@marvell.com>
Hi Jingju,
On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:43:08 +0800 wrote:
> The mvneta itself does not support WOL, but the PHY might.
> So pass the calls to the PHY
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingju Hou <houjingj@marvell.com>
> ---
> Since v1:
> - using phy_dev member in struct net_device
I noticed that you send a new v2 patch. So this patch should be ignored.
Some tips:
*the v2 patch title should be like:
[PATCH v2] net: mvneta: implement .set_wol and .get_wol
*you also add a commit msg in v2, you'd better mention it
in changes since v1.
Thanks,
Jisheng
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> index e05e227..78869fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> @@ -3908,6 +3908,25 @@ static int mvneta_ethtool_get_rxfh(struct net_device *dev, u32 *indir, u8 *key,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void
> +mvneta_ethtool_get_wol(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_wolinfo *wol)
> +{
> + wol->supported = 0;
> + wol->wolopts = 0;
> +
> + if (dev->phy_dev)
> + return phy_ethtool_get_wol(dev->phy_dev, wol);
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +mvneta_ethtool_set_wol(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_wolinfo *wol)
> +{
> + if (!dev->phy_dev)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + return phy_ethtool_set_wol(dev->phy_dev, wol);
> +}
> +
> static const struct net_device_ops mvneta_netdev_ops = {
> .ndo_open = mvneta_open,
> .ndo_stop = mvneta_stop,
> @@ -3937,6 +3956,8 @@ static int mvneta_ethtool_get_rxfh(struct net_device *dev, u32 *indir, u8 *key,
> .set_rxfh = mvneta_ethtool_set_rxfh,
> .get_link_ksettings = phy_ethtool_get_link_ksettings,
> .set_link_ksettings = mvneta_ethtool_set_link_ksettings,
> + .get_wol = mvneta_ethtool_get_wol,
> + .set_wol = mvneta_ethtool_set_wol,
> };
>
> /* Initialize hw */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-23 3:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-23 2:43 [PATCH] net: mvneta: implement .set_wol and .get_wol Jingju Hou
2017-01-23 2:58 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-01-22 10:06 Jingju Hou
2017-01-22 11:13 ` kbuild test robot
2017-01-22 11:21 ` kbuild test robot
2017-01-22 16:49 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170123105816.3400334b@xhacker \
--to=jszhang@marvell.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=houjingj@marvell.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).