netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bpf: Restrict cgroup bpf hooks to the init netns
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:09:53 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170124020950.GA72992@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ddd9e097f54e894197a2925731de02d1d3cae137.1485203708.git.luto@kernel.org>

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:36:08PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> To see how cgroup+bpf interacts with network namespaces, I wrote a
> little program called show_bind that calls getsockopt(...,
> SO_BINDTODEVICE, ...) and prints the result.  It did this:
> 
>  # ./ip link add dev vrf0 type vrf table 10
>  # ./ip vrf exec vrf0 ./show_bind
>  Default binding is "vrf0"
>  # ./ip vrf exec vrf0 unshare -n ./show_bind
>  show_bind: getsockopt: No such device
> 
> What's happening here is that "ip vrf" looks up vrf0's ifindex in
> the init netns and installs a hook that binds sockets to that
> ifindex.  When the hook runs in a different netns, it sets
> sk_bound_dev_if to an ifindex from the wrong netns, resulting in
> incorrect behavior.  In this particular example, the ifindex was 4
> and there was no ifindex 4 in the new netns.  If there had been,
> this test would have malfunctioned differently
> 
> Since it's rather late in the release cycle, let's punt.  This patch
> makes it impossible to install cgroup+bpf hooks outside the init
> netns and makes them not run on sockets that aren't in the init
> netns.
> 
> In a future release, it should be relatively straightforward to make
> these hooks be local to a netns and, if needed, to add a flag so
> that hooks can be made global if necessary.  Global hooks should
> presumably be constrained so that they can't write to any ifindex
> fields.
> 
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Cc: David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> ---
> 
> DaveM, this mitigates a bug in a feature that's new in 4.10, and the
> bug can be hit using current iproute2 -git.  please consider this for
> -net.
> 
> Changes from v1:
>  - Fix the commit message.  'git commit' was very clever and thought that
>    all the interesting bits of the test case were intended to be comments
>    and stripped them.  Whoops!
> 
> kernel/bpf/cgroup.c  | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> index a515f7b007c6..a824f543de69 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> @@ -143,6 +143,17 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb(struct sock *sk,
>  	if (!sk || !sk_fullsock(sk))
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * For now, socket bpf hooks attached to cgroups can only be
> +	 * installed in the init netns and only affect the init netns.
> +	 * This could be relaxed in the future once some semantic issues
> +	 * are resolved.  For example, ifindexes belonging to one netns
> +	 * should probably not be visible to hooks installed by programs
> +	 * running in a different netns.
> +	 */
> +	if (sock_net(sk) != &init_net)
> +		return 0;

Nack.
Such check will create absolutely broken abi that we won't be able to fix later.

> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index e89acea22ecf..c0bbc55e244d 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -902,6 +902,17 @@ static int bpf_prog_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr)
>  	struct cgroup *cgrp;
>  	enum bpf_prog_type ptype;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * For now, socket bpf hooks attached to cgroups can only be
> +	 * installed in the init netns and only affect the init netns.
> +	 * This could be relaxed in the future once some semantic issues
> +	 * are resolved.  For example, ifindexes belonging to one netns
> +	 * should probably not be visible to hooks installed by programs
> +	 * running in a different netns.

the comment is bogus and shows complete lack of understanding
how bpf is working and how it's being used.
See SKF_AD_IFINDEX that was in classic bpf forever.

> +	 */
> +	if (current->nsproxy->net_ns != &init_net)
> +		return -EINVAL;

this restriction I actually don't mind, since it indeed can be
relaxed later, but please make it proper with net_eq()

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-24  2:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-23 20:36 [PATCH v2] bpf: Restrict cgroup bpf hooks to the init netns Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-23 21:03 ` David Ahern
2017-01-23 21:49   ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-24  2:09 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2017-01-24  2:31   ` David Ahern
2017-01-24  2:39     ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-24  4:10       ` David Ahern
2017-01-24  4:16         ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-24  2:42   ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-24  3:13     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-01-24  3:37       ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-24  4:05         ` David Ahern
2017-01-24  4:32           ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-24 17:48             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-01-24 18:54               ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-24 20:29                 ` David Ahern
2017-01-24 21:24                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-24 21:34                     ` David Ahern
2017-01-25  0:11                     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-01-25  0:19                       ` David Ahern
2017-01-25 20:28                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-26  0:45                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-01-28 14:43                           ` Tejun Heo
2017-01-24 22:18                 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170124020950.GA72992@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com \
    --to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsa@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).