From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 11:46:45 +0300 Message-ID: <20170124084645.GA4201@mwanda> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Thomas Graf , Alexei Starovoitov , Joe Stringer , "David S. Miller" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: Alexei Starovoitov Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:44:34PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > wrote: > > Em Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu: > >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > >> > max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift > >> > could wrap. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > >> > >> Looks fine. I think 'net-next' is ok. > > > > I could process these patches, if that would help, > > Thanks for the offer. > I don't think there will be conflicts with all the work happening in net-next, > but it's best to avoid even possibility of it when we can. > Dan, > can you please resend the patch cc-ing Dave and netdev ? > please mention [PATCH net-next] in the subject. > Sure. regards, dan carpenter