Re: [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>]

Em Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:44:34PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Em Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu:
> >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >> > max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift
> >> > could wrap.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> >>
> >> Looks fine. I think 'net-next' is ok.
> >
> > I could process these patches, if that would help,
> 
> Thanks for the offer.
> I don't think there will be conflicts with all the work happening in net-next,
> but it's best to avoid even possibility of it when we can.

Okay sir, I'll let you know when/if the tests I perform building
samples/bpf/ in my containers catch something,

- Arnaldo

> Dan,
> can you please resend the patch cc-ing Dave and netdev ?
> please mention [PATCH net-next] in the subject.
> 
> > - Arnaldo
> >
> >> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> >
> >> > diff --git a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c
> >> > index ec8f3bb..bd06eef 100644
> >> > --- a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c
> >> > +++ b/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.c
> >> > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> >> >     for (i = 1; i <= max_key + 1; i++) {
> >> >             stars(starstr, data[i - 1], max_value, MAX_STARS);
> >> >             printf("%8ld -> %-8ld : %-8ld |%-*s|\n",
> >> > -                  (1l << i) >> 1, (1l << i) - 1, data[i - 1],
> >> > +                  (1ULL << i) >> 1, (1ULL << i) - 1, data[i - 1],
> >> >                    MAX_STARS, starstr);
> >> >     }
> >> >