From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: w@1wt.eu
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, weiwan@google.com, ycheng@google.com,
edumazet@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/tcp-fastopen: make connect()'s return case more consistent with non-TFO
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:12:32 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170125.141232.611265798570382143.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1485351766-17124-1-git-send-email-w@1wt.eu>
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:42:46 +0100
> Without TFO, any subsequent connect() call after a successful one returns
> -1 EISCONN. The last API update ensured that __inet_stream_connect() can
> return -1 EINPROGRESS in response to sendmsg() when TFO is in use to
> indicate that the connection is now in progress. Unfortunately since this
> function is used both for connect() and sendmsg(), it has the undesired
> side effect of making connect() now return -1 EINPROGRESS as well after
> a successful call, while at the same time poll() returns POLLOUT. This
> can confuse some applications which happen to call connect() and to
> check for -1 EISCONN to ensure the connection is usable, and for which
> EINPROGRESS indicates a need to poll, causing a loop.
>
> This problem was encountered in haproxy where a call to connect() is
> precisely used in certain cases to confirm a connection's readiness.
> While arguably haproxy's behaviour should be improved here, it seems
> important to aim at a more robust behaviour when the goal of the new
> API is to make it easier to implement TFO in existing applications.
>
> This patch simply ensures that we preserve the same semantics as in
> the non-TFO case on the connect() syscall when using TFO, while still
> returning -1 EINPROGRESS on sendmsg(). For this we simply tell
> __inet_stream_connect() whether we're doing a regular connect() or in
> fact connecting for a sendmsg() call.
>
> Cc: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>
> Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Applied.
parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-25 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <1485351766-17124-1-git-send-email-w@1wt.eu>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170125.141232.611265798570382143.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=weiwan@google.com \
--cc=ycheng@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox