From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Subject: [RHEL7.4 kernel PATCH 11/30] VSOCK: do not disconnect socket when peer has shutdown SEND only Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 15:03:08 +0000 Message-ID: <20170127150327.16593-12-stefanha@redhat.com> References: <20170127150327.16593-1-stefanha@redhat.com> Cc: "David S . Miller" , rhvirt-patches@redhat.com, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Ian Campbell , "David S. Miller" , Stefan Hajnoczi , Claudio Imbrenda , Andy King , Dmitry Torokhov , Jorgen Hansen , Adit Ranadive , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: rhkernel-list@redhat.com Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44584 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932237AbdA0PMt (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:12:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20170127150327.16593-1-stefanha@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Ian Campbell The peer may be expecting a reply having sent a request and then done a shutdown(SHUT_WR), so tearing down the whole socket at this point seems wrong and breaks for me with a client which does a SHUT_WR. Looking at other socket family's stream_recvmsg callbacks doing a shutdown here does not seem to be the norm and removing it does not seem to have had any adverse effects that I can see. I'm using Stefan's RFC virtio transport patches, I'm unsure of the impact on the vmci transport. Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Claudio Imbrenda Cc: Andy King Cc: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Jorgen Hansen Cc: Adit Ranadive Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller (cherry picked from commit dedc58e067d8c379a15a8a183c5db318201295bb) Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi --- net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 21 +-------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c index 9a96342..510d14f 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c @@ -1809,27 +1809,8 @@ vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct kiocb *kiocb, else if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) err = 0; - if (copied > 0) { - /* We only do these additional bookkeeping/notification steps - * if we actually copied something out of the queue pair - * instead of just peeking ahead. - */ - - if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK)) { - /* If the other side has shutdown for sending and there - * is nothing more to read, then modify the socket - * state. - */ - if (vsk->peer_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN) { - if (vsock_stream_has_data(vsk) <= 0) { - sk->sk_state = SS_UNCONNECTED; - sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE); - sk->sk_state_change(sk); - } - } - } + if (copied > 0) err = copied; - } out: release_sock(sk); -- 2.9.3