From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@pengutronix.de, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] can: Fix kernel panic at security_sock_rcv_skb
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 21:46:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170127204627.11735-2-mkl@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170127204627.11735-1-mkl@pengutronix.de>
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Zhang Yanmin reported crashes [1] and provided a patch adding a
synchronize_rcu() call in can_rx_unregister()
The main problem seems that the sockets themselves are not RCU
protected.
If CAN uses RCU for delivery, then sockets should be freed only after
one RCU grace period.
Recent kernels could use sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_RCU_FREE), but let's
ease stable backports with the following fix instead.
[1]
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
IP: [<ffffffff81495e25>] selinux_socket_sock_rcv_skb+0x65/0x2a0
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
[<ffffffff81485d8c>] security_sock_rcv_skb+0x4c/0x60
[<ffffffff81d55771>] sk_filter+0x41/0x210
[<ffffffff81d12913>] sock_queue_rcv_skb+0x53/0x3a0
[<ffffffff81f0a2b3>] raw_rcv+0x2a3/0x3c0
[<ffffffff81f06eab>] can_rcv_filter+0x12b/0x370
[<ffffffff81f07af9>] can_receive+0xd9/0x120
[<ffffffff81f07beb>] can_rcv+0xab/0x100
[<ffffffff81d362ac>] __netif_receive_skb_core+0xd8c/0x11f0
[<ffffffff81d36734>] __netif_receive_skb+0x24/0xb0
[<ffffffff81d37f67>] process_backlog+0x127/0x280
[<ffffffff81d36f7b>] net_rx_action+0x33b/0x4f0
[<ffffffff810c88d4>] __do_softirq+0x184/0x440
[<ffffffff81f9e86c>] do_softirq_own_stack+0x1c/0x30
<EOI>
[<ffffffff810c76fb>] do_softirq.part.18+0x3b/0x40
[<ffffffff810c8bed>] do_softirq+0x1d/0x20
[<ffffffff81d30085>] netif_rx_ni+0xe5/0x110
[<ffffffff8199cc87>] slcan_receive_buf+0x507/0x520
[<ffffffff8167ef7c>] flush_to_ldisc+0x21c/0x230
[<ffffffff810e3baf>] process_one_work+0x24f/0x670
[<ffffffff810e44ed>] worker_thread+0x9d/0x6f0
[<ffffffff810e4450>] ? rescuer_thread+0x480/0x480
[<ffffffff810ebafc>] kthread+0x12c/0x150
[<ffffffff81f9ccef>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
Reported-by: Zhang Yanmin <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Cc: linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
---
include/linux/can/core.h | 7 +++----
net/can/af_can.c | 12 ++++++++++--
net/can/af_can.h | 3 ++-
net/can/bcm.c | 4 ++--
net/can/gw.c | 2 +-
net/can/raw.c | 4 ++--
6 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/can/core.h b/include/linux/can/core.h
index a0875001b13c..df08a41d5be5 100644
--- a/include/linux/can/core.h
+++ b/include/linux/can/core.h
@@ -45,10 +45,9 @@ struct can_proto {
extern int can_proto_register(const struct can_proto *cp);
extern void can_proto_unregister(const struct can_proto *cp);
-extern int can_rx_register(struct net_device *dev, canid_t can_id,
- canid_t mask,
- void (*func)(struct sk_buff *, void *),
- void *data, char *ident);
+int can_rx_register(struct net_device *dev, canid_t can_id, canid_t mask,
+ void (*func)(struct sk_buff *, void *),
+ void *data, char *ident, struct sock *sk);
extern void can_rx_unregister(struct net_device *dev, canid_t can_id,
canid_t mask,
diff --git a/net/can/af_can.c b/net/can/af_can.c
index 1108079d934f..5488e4a6ccd0 100644
--- a/net/can/af_can.c
+++ b/net/can/af_can.c
@@ -445,6 +445,7 @@ static struct hlist_head *find_rcv_list(canid_t *can_id, canid_t *mask,
* @func: callback function on filter match
* @data: returned parameter for callback function
* @ident: string for calling module identification
+ * @sk: socket pointer (might be NULL)
*
* Description:
* Invokes the callback function with the received sk_buff and the given
@@ -468,7 +469,7 @@ static struct hlist_head *find_rcv_list(canid_t *can_id, canid_t *mask,
*/
int can_rx_register(struct net_device *dev, canid_t can_id, canid_t mask,
void (*func)(struct sk_buff *, void *), void *data,
- char *ident)
+ char *ident, struct sock *sk)
{
struct receiver *r;
struct hlist_head *rl;
@@ -496,6 +497,7 @@ int can_rx_register(struct net_device *dev, canid_t can_id, canid_t mask,
r->func = func;
r->data = data;
r->ident = ident;
+ r->sk = sk;
hlist_add_head_rcu(&r->list, rl);
d->entries++;
@@ -520,8 +522,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(can_rx_register);
static void can_rx_delete_receiver(struct rcu_head *rp)
{
struct receiver *r = container_of(rp, struct receiver, rcu);
+ struct sock *sk = r->sk;
kmem_cache_free(rcv_cache, r);
+ if (sk)
+ sock_put(sk);
}
/**
@@ -596,8 +601,11 @@ void can_rx_unregister(struct net_device *dev, canid_t can_id, canid_t mask,
spin_unlock(&can_rcvlists_lock);
/* schedule the receiver item for deletion */
- if (r)
+ if (r) {
+ if (r->sk)
+ sock_hold(r->sk);
call_rcu(&r->rcu, can_rx_delete_receiver);
+ }
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(can_rx_unregister);
diff --git a/net/can/af_can.h b/net/can/af_can.h
index fca0fe9fc45a..b86f5129e838 100644
--- a/net/can/af_can.h
+++ b/net/can/af_can.h
@@ -50,13 +50,14 @@
struct receiver {
struct hlist_node list;
- struct rcu_head rcu;
canid_t can_id;
canid_t mask;
unsigned long matches;
void (*func)(struct sk_buff *, void *);
void *data;
char *ident;
+ struct sock *sk;
+ struct rcu_head rcu;
};
#define CAN_SFF_RCV_ARRAY_SZ (1 << CAN_SFF_ID_BITS)
diff --git a/net/can/bcm.c b/net/can/bcm.c
index 21ac75390e3d..5c9407181918 100644
--- a/net/can/bcm.c
+++ b/net/can/bcm.c
@@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@ static int bcm_rx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg,
err = can_rx_register(dev, op->can_id,
REGMASK(op->can_id),
bcm_rx_handler, op,
- "bcm");
+ "bcm", sk);
op->rx_reg_dev = dev;
dev_put(dev);
@@ -1225,7 +1225,7 @@ static int bcm_rx_setup(struct bcm_msg_head *msg_head, struct msghdr *msg,
} else
err = can_rx_register(NULL, op->can_id,
REGMASK(op->can_id),
- bcm_rx_handler, op, "bcm");
+ bcm_rx_handler, op, "bcm", sk);
if (err) {
/* this bcm rx op is broken -> remove it */
list_del(&op->list);
diff --git a/net/can/gw.c b/net/can/gw.c
index a54ab0c82104..7056a1a2bb70 100644
--- a/net/can/gw.c
+++ b/net/can/gw.c
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ static inline int cgw_register_filter(struct cgw_job *gwj)
{
return can_rx_register(gwj->src.dev, gwj->ccgw.filter.can_id,
gwj->ccgw.filter.can_mask, can_can_gw_rcv,
- gwj, "gw");
+ gwj, "gw", NULL);
}
static inline void cgw_unregister_filter(struct cgw_job *gwj)
diff --git a/net/can/raw.c b/net/can/raw.c
index b075f028d7e2..6dc546a06673 100644
--- a/net/can/raw.c
+++ b/net/can/raw.c
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static int raw_enable_filters(struct net_device *dev, struct sock *sk,
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
err = can_rx_register(dev, filter[i].can_id,
filter[i].can_mask,
- raw_rcv, sk, "raw");
+ raw_rcv, sk, "raw", sk);
if (err) {
/* clean up successfully registered filters */
while (--i >= 0)
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static int raw_enable_errfilter(struct net_device *dev, struct sock *sk,
if (err_mask)
err = can_rx_register(dev, 0, err_mask | CAN_ERR_FLAG,
- raw_rcv, sk, "raw");
+ raw_rcv, sk, "raw", sk);
return err;
}
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-27 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-27 20:46 pull-request: can 2017-01-27 Marc Kleine-Budde
2017-01-27 20:46 ` Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
2017-01-29 23:46 ` David Miller
2017-01-30 9:12 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-01-12 22:40 [PATCH] can: Fix kernel panic at security_sock_rcv_skb william.c.roberts
2017-01-12 23:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-12 6:33 Liu ShuoX
2017-01-12 8:22 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2017-01-12 13:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-01-12 16:33 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2017-01-14 3:43 ` Liu Shuo
2017-01-14 13:53 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2017-01-14 17:30 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170127204627.11735-2-mkl@pengutronix.de \
--to=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).