From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: BUG at net/sctp/socket.c:7425
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 08:40:02 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170129104002.GJ3781@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48766e1c-99c9-3a88-0fec-998bf4db9a3a@linux.com>
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 03:35:31AM +0300, Alexander Popov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm running the syzkaller fuzzer for v4.10-rc4 (0aa0313f9d576affd7747cc3f179feb097d28990)
> and have such a crash in sctp code:
>
...
>
> Unfortunately, I didn't manage to get a C program reproducing the crash (looks like race).
> However, I stably hit it on my setup - so I can help fixing the issue.
>
> The crash happens here:
> /* Let another process have a go. Since we are going
> * to sleep anyway.
> */
> release_sock(sk);
> current_timeo = schedule_timeout(current_timeo);
> > BUG_ON(sk != asoc->base.sk);
> lock_sock(sk);
>
> I've added some debugging output and see, that the original value of asoc->base.sk is
> changed to the address of another struct sock, which appeared in sctp_endpoint_init()
> shortly before the crash.
You need some threading for this to happen. asoc->base.sk will change
if you peeloff the association.
It seems you had one thread waiting for some sndbuf to be available on a
sendmsg() call and another thread did a peeloff on the association that
the first thread was using.
Yeah I think this will reproduce it.
And in this case, it's probably better if we just return -EPIPE as the
association doesn't exist in that socket anymore instead of the BUG_ON.
Marcelo
---8<---
diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index 26a514269b92..e9870aead88b 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -6838,7 +6838,8 @@ static int sctp_wait_for_sndbuf(struct sctp_association *asoc, long *timeo_p,
*/
sctp_release_sock(sk);
current_timeo = schedule_timeout(current_timeo);
- BUG_ON(sk != asoc->base.sk);
+ if (sk != asoc->base.sk)
+ goto do_error;
sctp_lock_sock(sk);
*timeo_p = current_timeo;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-29 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-29 0:35 BUG at net/sctp/socket.c:7425 Alexander Popov
2017-01-29 10:40 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner [this message]
2017-01-30 11:19 ` Alexander Popov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170129104002.GJ3781@localhost.localdomain \
--to=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.popov@linux.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox