From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Sudarsana Kalluru <Sudarsana.Kalluru@cavium.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Yuval.Mintz@cavium.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] qed: Add infrastructure for PTP support.
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 16:28:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170129152812.GB2223@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1485674903-27689-2-git-send-email-Sudarsana.Kalluru@cavium.com>
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 11:28:22PM -0800, Sudarsana Kalluru wrote:
> +/* Adjust the HW clock by a rate given in parts-per-million (ppm) units.
> + * FW/HW accepts the adjustment value in terms of 3 parameters:
> + * Drift period - adjustment happens once in certain number of nano seconds.
> + * Drift value - time is adjusted by a certain value, for example by 5 ns.
> + * Drift direction - add or subtract the adjustment value.
> + * The routine translates ppm into the adjustment triplet in an optimal manner.
> + */
> +static int qed_ptp_hw_adjfreq(struct qed_dev *cdev, s32 ppb)
> +{
> + struct qed_hwfn *p_hwfn = QED_LEADING_HWFN(cdev);
> + s64 period, period1, period2, dif, dif1, dif2;
> + struct qed_ptt *p_ptt = p_hwfn->p_ptp_ptt;
> + int drift_dir, best_val, best_period;
> + s64 best_dif, temp, val;
> + u32 drift_ctr_cfg = 0;
> + u32 drift_state;
> +
> + best_dif = 1000000000;
> + best_period = 1;
> + best_val = 0;
> + drift_dir = 1;
> +
> + if (ppb < 0) {
> + ppb = -ppb;
> + drift_dir = 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (ppb == 0) {
> + /* No clock adjustment required */
> + best_val = 0;
> + best_period = 0xFFFFFFF;
> + } else {
> + /* Adjustment value is up to +/-7ns, find an optimal value in
> + * this range.
> + */
> + for (val = 0; val <= 7; val++) {
> + period1 = val * 1000000000;
> + do_div(period1, ppb);
One,
> + period1 -= 8;
> + do_div(period1, 16);
two,
> + if (period1 < 1)
> + period1 = 1;
> + if (period1 > 0xFFFFFFE)
> + period1 = 0xFFFFFFE;
> + period2 = period1 + 1;
> +
> + temp = val * 1000000000;
> + do_div(temp, (period1 * 16 + 8));
three,
> + dif1 = ppb - temp;
> + if (dif1 < 0)
> + dif1 = -dif1;
> +
> + temp = val * 1000000000;
> + do_div(temp, (period2 * 16 + 8));
four times seven makes twenty-eight 64 bit divisions per adjustment!
Isn't there a smarter way to do this?
Also, the case where val=0 makes little sense.
Thanks,
Richard
> + dif2 = ppb - temp;
> + if (dif2 < 0)
> + dif2 = -dif2;
> +
> + dif = min_t(s64, dif1, dif2);
> + period = (dif1 < dif2) ? period1 : period2;
> + if (dif < best_dif) {
> + best_dif = dif;
> + best_val = (int)val;
> + best_period = (int)period;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + drift_ctr_cfg = (best_period << QED_DRIFT_CNTR_TIME_QUANTA_SHIFT) |
> + (best_val << QED_DRIFT_CNTR_ADJUSTMENT_SHIFT) |
> + (drift_dir << QED_DRIFT_CNTR_DIRECTION_SHIFT);
> +
> + qed_wr(p_hwfn, p_ptt, NIG_REG_TSGEN_RST_DRIFT_CNTR, 0x1);
> +
> + drift_state = qed_rd(p_hwfn, p_ptt, NIG_REG_TSGEN_RST_DRIFT_CNTR);
> + if (drift_state & 1) {
> + qed_wr(p_hwfn, p_ptt, NIG_REG_TSGEN_DRIFT_CNTR_CONF,
> + drift_ctr_cfg);
> + } else {
> + DP_INFO(p_hwfn, "Drift counter is not reset\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + qed_wr(p_hwfn, p_ptt, NIG_REG_TSGEN_RST_DRIFT_CNTR, 0x0);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-29 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-29 7:28 [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] qed*: Add support for PTP Sudarsana Kalluru
2017-01-29 7:28 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] qed: Add infrastructure for PTP support Sudarsana Kalluru
2017-01-29 8:32 ` kbuild test robot
2017-01-29 15:28 ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2017-01-29 15:31 ` Richard Cochran
2017-01-29 17:26 ` Mintz, Yuval
2017-01-29 20:51 ` Richard Cochran
2017-01-29 21:36 ` Mintz, Yuval
2017-01-30 13:26 ` Richard Cochran
2017-01-30 18:00 ` Mintz, Yuval
2017-01-29 7:28 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] qede: Add driver support for PTP Sudarsana Kalluru
2017-01-29 15:35 ` Richard Cochran
2017-01-29 17:30 ` Mintz, Yuval
2017-01-29 21:02 ` Richard Cochran
2017-01-29 21:40 ` Mintz, Yuval
2017-01-30 14:34 ` David Laight
2017-01-30 17:55 ` Mintz, Yuval
2017-01-31 10:03 ` David Laight
2017-01-31 14:31 ` Mintz, Yuval
2017-01-31 14:53 ` Richard Cochran
2017-01-31 15:08 ` Mintz, Yuval
2017-01-31 17:43 ` Richard Cochran
2017-01-29 15:09 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] qed*: Add " Richard Cochran
2017-01-29 17:23 ` Mintz, Yuval
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170129152812.GB2223@localhost.localdomain \
--to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=Sudarsana.Kalluru@cavium.com \
--cc=Yuval.Mintz@cavium.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).