From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Kicinski Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 01/10] bnxt_en: Refactor rx SKB function. Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 20:26:43 -0800 Message-ID: <20170130202643.5c0130ad@cakuba> References: <1485827375-20421-1-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com> <1485827375-20421-2-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Chan Return-path: Received: from mx4.wp.pl ([212.77.101.12]:30087 "EHLO mx4.wp.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750764AbdAaExp (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2017 23:53:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1485827375-20421-2-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 20:49:26 -0500, Michael Chan wrote: > @@ -776,7 +778,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *bnxt_rx_skb(struct bnxt *bp, > } > > skb_reserve(skb, BNXT_RX_OFFSET); > - skb_put(skb, len); > + skb_put(skb, len & 0xffff); > return skb; > } Looks unrelated?