netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: bjorn.topel@gmail.com, jasowang@redhat.com, ast@fb.com,
	alexander.duyck@gmail.com, brouer@redhat.com,
	john.r.fastabend@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] rx zero copy interface for af_packet
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:30:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170131163042.GF8649@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170127213132.14162.82951.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810>

On (01/27/17 13:33), John Fastabend wrote:
> 
> This is an experimental implementation of rx zero copy for af_packet.
> Its a bit rough and likely has errors but the plan is to clean it up
> over the next few months.
> 
> And seeing I said I would post it in another thread a few days back
> here it is.

One question/comment about this: sure, this saves us an skb copy
on the rx side, but at least for the Tx side, I think there may
be a trade-off between the overhead from the skb setup and the
ease of offloading checksum (and UFO where it is available) to
consider, even for PF_PACKET.

Using PF_PACKET works well for stateless datagram protocols like 
UDP, and for UDP sockets, we find that just switching to Jumbo
(to simulate a poor-man's-UFO) gives us significant improvement
in both throughput and latency for our RDBMS workloads - and 
having the sk_buff facilitates using existing driver-kernel interfaces
for offload easily, so while we may gain some perf improvment by shaving
of the sk_buff overhead, the trade-off needs to be considered.

--Sowmini

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-31 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-27 21:33 [RFC PATCH 0/2] rx zero copy interface for af_packet John Fastabend
2017-01-27 21:33 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] af_packet: direct dma for packet ineterface John Fastabend
2017-01-30 18:16   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-01-30 21:51     ` John Fastabend
2017-01-31  1:31       ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-02-01  5:09         ` John Fastabend
2017-03-06 21:28           ` chetan loke
2017-01-31 12:20       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-02-01  5:01         ` John Fastabend
2017-02-04  3:10   ` Jason Wang
2017-01-27 21:34 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] ixgbe: add af_packet direct copy support John Fastabend
2017-01-31  2:53   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-02-01  4:58     ` John Fastabend
2017-01-30 22:02 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] rx zero copy interface for af_packet David Miller
2017-01-31 16:30 ` Sowmini Varadhan [this message]
2017-02-01  4:23   ` John Fastabend
2017-01-31 19:39 ` tndave
2017-02-01  5:09   ` John Fastabend

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170131163042.GF8649@oracle.com \
    --to=sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@fb.com \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@gmail.com \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).