netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Andreas Schultz <aschultz@tpip.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, laforge <laforge@gnumonks.org>,
	Lionel Gauthier <Lionel.Gauthier@eurecom.fr>,
	openbsc <openbsc@lists.osmocom.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] gtp: add socket to pdp context
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 15:28:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170202142842.GA19643@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <858150010.730228.1486044775198.JavaMail.zimbra@tpip.net>

On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 03:12:55PM +0100, Andreas Schultz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> ----- On Feb 2, 2017, at 2:56 PM, pablo pablo@netfilter.org wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:37:12PM +0100, Andreas Schultz wrote:
> >> Having the socket present in context simplifies the sending logic.
> >> It also fixes the invalid assumption that we have to use the same
> >> sending socket for all client IP's on a specific gtp interface.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Schultz <aschultz@tpip.net>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/net/gtp.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> >>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/gtp.c b/drivers/net/gtp.c
> >> index 68c6c9b..ff00597 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/gtp.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/gtp.c
> > [...]
> >> @@ -984,16 +966,26 @@ static int ipv4_pdp_add(struct gtp_dev *gtp, struct
> >> genl_info *info)
> >>  	return 0;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> +static void pdp_context_free(struct rcu_head *head)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct pdp_ctx *pctx = container_of(head, struct pdp_ctx, rcu_head);
> >> +
> >> +	sock_put(pctx->sk);
> >> +	kfree(pctx);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  static void pdp_context_delete(struct pdp_ctx *pctx)
> >>  {
> >>  	hlist_del_rcu(&pctx->hlist_tid);
> >>  	hlist_del_rcu(&pctx->hlist_addr);
> >> -	kfree(pctx);
> >> +	call_rcu(&pctx->rcu_head, pdp_context_free);
> > 
> > This is fixing incorrect rcu conversion in 4/6. Please, fix this there.
> 
> Ehm, right, but the kfree in 4/6 could have been a kfree_rcu instead without
> the call_rcu.
> 
> Do you prefer to introduce the call_rcu in 4/6 and then just add the sock_put
> in this patch or should I change 4/6 to kfree_rcu and do the call_rcu
> conversion here?

I suggest you just call kfree_rcu() from 4/6.

Regarding holding socket reference, see my comment for patch 1/6.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-02 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-30 16:37 [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] gtp: misc improvements Andreas Schultz
2017-01-30 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] gtp: make GTP sockets in gtp_newlink optional Andreas Schultz
2017-02-02 14:10   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-02-02 14:30     ` Andreas Schultz
2017-02-02 14:32       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-02-06 13:51   ` Harald Welte
2017-01-30 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] gtp: merge gtp_get_net and gtp_genl_find_dev Andreas Schultz
2017-02-06 13:55   ` Harald Welte
2017-02-13 14:13     ` Andreas Schultz
2017-02-13 14:51       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-01-30 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] gtp: unify genl_find_pdp and prepare for per socket lookup Andreas Schultz
2017-02-02 14:19   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-02-02 14:27     ` Andreas Schultz
2017-02-02 14:31       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-02-06 13:56   ` Harald Welte
2017-01-30 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/6] gtp: consolidate pdp context destruction into helper Andreas Schultz
2017-02-06 13:58   ` Harald Welte
2017-02-13 14:14     ` Andreas Schultz
2017-01-30 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] gtp: add socket to pdp context Andreas Schultz
2017-02-02 13:56   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-02-02 14:12     ` Andreas Schultz
2017-02-02 14:28       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2017-02-02 14:38         ` Andreas Schultz
2017-02-02 14:46           ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-02-02 15:07             ` Andreas Schultz
2017-02-06 14:04               ` Harald Welte
2017-01-30 16:37 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/6] gtp: consolidate gtp socket rx path Andreas Schultz
2017-01-31 18:05 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] gtp: misc improvements David Miller
2017-02-06 13:46   ` Harald Welte

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170202142842.GA19643@salvia \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=Lionel.Gauthier@eurecom.fr \
    --cc=aschultz@tpip.net \
    --cc=laforge@gnumonks.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=openbsc@lists.osmocom.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).