From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] be2net: get rid of custom busy poll code Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 16:07:06 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20170203.160706.1485056581935525081.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1486059360.21871.6.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, sathya.perla@broadcom.com, ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com, somnath.kotur@broadcom.com To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:52834 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752441AbdBCVHI (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2017 16:07:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1486059360.21871.6.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Eric Dumazet Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 10:16:00 -0800 > From: Eric Dumazet > > Compared to custom busy_poll, the generic NAPI one is better, since > it allows to use GRO, and it removes a lot of code and extra locked > operations in fast path. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Applied.