From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] bridge: improve cache utilization
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 13:46:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170204134626.311e3742@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486227909-18319-1-git-send-email-nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 18:05:05 +0100
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> This is the first set which begins to deal with the bad bridge cache
> access patterns. The first patch rearranges the bridge and port structs
> a little so the frequently (and closely) accessed members are in the same
> cache line. The second patch then moves the garbage collection to a
> workqueue trying to improve system responsiveness under load (many fdbs)
> and more importantly removes the need to check if the matched entry is
> expired in __br_fdb_get which was a major source of false-sharing.
> The third patch is a preparation for the final one which
> If properly configured, i.e. ports bound to CPUs (thus updating "updated"
> locally) then the bridge's HitM goes from 100% to 0%, but even without
> binding we get a win because previously every lookup that iterated over
> the hash chain caused false-sharing due to the first cache line being
> used for both mac/vid and used/updated fields.
>
> Some results from tests I've run:
> (note that these were run in good conditions for the baseline, everything
> ran on a single NUMA node and there were only 3 fdbs)
>
> 1. baseline
> 100% Load HitM on the fdbs (between everyone who has done lookups and hit
> one of the 3 hash chains of the communicating
> src/dst fdbs)
> Overall 5.06% Load HitM for the bridge, first place in the list
>
> 2. patched & ports bound to CPUs
> 0% Local load HitM, bridge is not even in the c2c report list
> Also there's 3% consistent improvement in netperf tests.
What tool are you using to measure this?
>
> Thanks,
> Nik
>
> Nikolay Aleksandrov (4):
> bridge: modify bridge and port to have often accessed fields in one
> cache line
> bridge: move to workqueue gc
> bridge: move write-heavy fdb members in their own cache line
> bridge: fdb: write to used and updated at most once per jiffy
>
> net/bridge/br_device.c | 1 +
> net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------
> net/bridge/br_if.c | 2 +-
> net/bridge/br_input.c | 3 ++-
> net/bridge/br_ioctl.c | 2 +-
> net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 2 +-
> net/bridge/br_private.h | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> net/bridge/br_stp.c | 2 +-
> net/bridge/br_stp_if.c | 4 ++--
> net/bridge/br_stp_timer.c | 2 --
> net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c | 2 +-
> 11 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
Looks good thanks, I wounder this impacts smaller work loads.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-04 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-04 17:05 [PATCH net-next 0/4] bridge: improve cache utilization Nikolay Aleksandrov via Bridge
2017-02-04 17:05 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] bridge: modify bridge and port to have often accessed fields in one cache line Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-02-04 17:05 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] bridge: move to workqueue gc Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-02-04 17:05 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] bridge: move write-heavy fdb members in their own cache line Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-02-04 17:05 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] bridge: fdb: write to used and updated at most once per jiffy Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-02-07 16:46 ` [PATCH net-next] bridge: avoid unnecessary read of jiffies Stephen Hemminger
2017-02-07 16:56 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov via Bridge
2017-02-07 19:16 ` David Miller
2017-02-04 21:46 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2017-02-04 21:58 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] bridge: improve cache utilization Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-02-07 3:53 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170204134626.311e3742@xeon-e3 \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).