From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: bjorn@mork.no
Cc: stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] sierra_net: Add support for IPv6 and Dual-Stack Link Sense Indications
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 10:23:40 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170208.102340.236303502527636848.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87inolropl.fsf@miraculix.mork.no>
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 10:55:50 +0100
> Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de> writes:
>
>> If a context is configured as dualstack ("IPv4v6"), the modem indicates
>> the context activation with a slightly different indication message.
>> The dual-stack indication omits the link_type (IPv4/v6) and adds
>> additional address fields.
>
> Great!
>
>> IPv6 LSIs are identical to IPv4 LSIs, but have a different link type.
>> +struct lsi_umts_dual {
>> + struct lsi_umts lsi;
>> + u8 pdp_addr4_len; /* NW-supplied PDP IPv4 address len */
>> + u8 pdp_addr4[4]; /* NW-supplied PDP IPv4 address (bigendian)) */
>> + u8 pdp_addr6_len; /* NW-supplied PDP IPv6 address len */
>> + u8 pdp_addr6[16]; /* NW-supplied PDP IPv6 address (bigendian)) */
>
>
> Maybe use "struct in_addr" and "struct in6_addr" for all the address
> fields, making them a bit more accessible and avoiding having to define
> endianness explicitly?
Can't do that, it will add padding to the structure and not match
what is really in the header.
The problem is that we get a "u8" length first which starts the
address on an odd byte.
And we don't want to use "__packed" to fix this either.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-08 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20170208014633.15438-1-stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
[not found] ` <20170208014633.15438-1-stefan.bruens-vA1bhqPz9FBZXbeN9DUtxg@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-08 1:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] sierra_net: Add support for IPv6 and Dual-Stack Link Sense Indications Stefan Brüns
2017-02-08 9:55 ` Bjørn Mork
2017-02-08 15:23 ` David Miller [this message]
2017-02-08 1:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] sierra_net: Skip validating irrelevant fields for IDLE LSIs Stefan Brüns
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170208.102340.236303502527636848.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).