From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Cochran Subject: Re: Extending socket timestamping API for NTP Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 06:27:46 +0100 Message-ID: <20170208052746.GA1779@localhost.localdomain> References: <20170207140144.GA11233@localhost> <02874ECE860811409154E81DA85FBB5857D6DC87@ORSMSX115.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "Keller, Jacob E" , Miroslav Lichvar , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Jiri Benc , Willem de Bruijn To: Denny Page Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:37735 "EHLO mail-wm0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751131AbdBHF2m (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2017 00:28:42 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id v77so177986403wmv.0 for ; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 21:27:51 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 05:52:52PM -0800, Denny Page wrote: > Most, but not all. The TI DP83630 doesn’t support timestamping for all packets, but it does support either PTP or NTP: That is the one and only device that explicitly supports NTP. This is a nice idea, of course, but it just did not take off among other products. Thanks, Richard