From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net/sched: Use TC skip flags to reflect HW offload status Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:50:12 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20170212.115012.462374721298882143.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1486649888-2786-1-git-send-email-ogerlitz@mellanox.com> <20170210.143636.253114480501653886.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ogerlitz@mellanox.com, daniel@iogearbox.net, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, john.r.fastabend@intel.com, amir@vadai.me, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jiri@mellanox.com, paulb@mellanox.com, roid@mellanox.com To: gerlitz.or@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:55446 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751276AbdBLQuQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:50:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Or Gerlitz Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:54:25 +0200 > Re the old kernel argument, these patches are small and pointish, > would it make sense to you to consider them as fixes and push them > back to the relevant stable kernels? Sorry, it doesn't work that way.