From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] bpf: introduce BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE flag
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 14:47:39 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170212054739.GA13855@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486787304-2805663-1-git-send-email-ast@fb.com>
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 08:28:24PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> If BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE flag is used in BPF_PROG_ATTACH command
> to the given cgroup the descendent cgroup will be able to override
> effective bpf program that was inherited from this cgroup.
> By default it's not passed, therefore override is disallowed.
>
> Examples:
> 1.
> prog X attached to /A with default
> prog Y fails to attach to /A/B and /A/B/C
> Everything under /A runs prog X
>
> 2.
> prog X attached to /A with allow_override.
> prog Y fails to attach to /A/B with default (non-override)
> prog M attached to /A/B with allow_override.
> Everything under /A/B runs prog M only.
>
> 3.
> prog X attached to /A with allow_override.
> prog Y fails to attach to /A with default.
> The user has to detach first to switch the mode.
>
> In the future this behavior may be extended with a chain of
> non-overridable programs.
>
> Also fix the bug where detach from cgroup where nothing is attached
> was not throwing error. Return ENOENT in such case.
>
> Add several testcases and adjust libbpf.
>
> Fixes: 3007098494be ("cgroup: add support for eBPF programs")
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The cgroup part looks good to me. Please feel free to add
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
One question tho. Is there a specific reason to disallow attaching
!overridable program under an overridable one? Isn't disallowing
attaching programs if the closest ancestor is !overridable enough?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-12 5:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-11 4:28 [PATCH v2 net] bpf: introduce BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE flag Alexei Starovoitov
2017-02-11 17:14 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-02-12 5:47 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2017-02-12 5:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-02-12 8:01 ` Daniel Mack
2017-02-12 22:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-02-13 2:52 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170212054739.GA13855@mtj.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=daniel@zonque.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).