From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Harald Welte Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gtp: support SGSN-side tunnels Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:23:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20170213142321.vkas3kdsc43xs35v@nataraja> References: <20170203091231.10142-1-jonas@southpole.se> <1107124975.65949.1486977919253.JavaMail.zimbra@tpip.net> <20170213111640.GA1458@salvia> <1384904207.69904.1486986729381.JavaMail.zimbra@tpip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: pablo , Jonas Bonn , netdev , osmocom-net-gprs@lists.osmocom.org To: Andreas Schultz Return-path: Received: from ganesha.gnumonks.org ([213.95.27.120]:42923 "EHLO ganesha.gnumonks.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752396AbdBMOXq (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:23:46 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1384904207.69904.1486986729381.JavaMail.zimbra@tpip.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Andreas, Pablo, Jonas, I think that the SGSN/GGSN role flag (or whatever it may end up being called) logically belongs in the gtp-device at this point, and will in the future belong to the UDP/GTP-socket (with Andreas' proposed changes). Having it per-pdp-context indeed seems odd and just provide a way to create broken configurations (and increase the memory use per pdp context, of which you have many more than netdevs or gtp-sockets). -- - Harald Welte http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)