From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 07:35:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20170214063514.GA10242@gmail.com> References: <20170214091250.57d054b2@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , Networking , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Alexander Shishkin To: Stephen Rothwell Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:35846 "EHLO mail-wm0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750767AbdBNGfT (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2017 01:35:19 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170214091250.57d054b2@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Stephen Rothwell wrote: > --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h > +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h > @@ -116,6 +116,12 @@ enum bpf_attach_type { > > #define MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE __MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE > > +/* If BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE flag is used in BPF_PROG_ATTACH command > + * to the given target_fd cgroup the descendent cgroup will be able to > + * override effective bpf program that was inherited from this cgroup > + */ > +#define BPF_F_ALLOW_OVERRIDE (1U << 0) > + BTW., guys, for heaven's sake, please use the standard (multi-line) comment style: /* * Comment ..... * ...... goes here. */ specified in Documentation/CodingStyle... It's not that hard to create visually balanced patterns. Thanks, Ingo