Re: [PATCH next 0/4] bonding: winter cleanup

[Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>]

Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 08:23:13PM CET, maheshb@google.com wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> wrote:
>> Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 02:08:16AM CET, mahesh@bandewar.net wrote:
>>>From: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@google.com>
>>>
>>>Few cleanup patches that I have accumulated over some time now.
>>>
>>>(a) First two patches are basically to move the work-queue initialization
>>>    from every ndo_open / bond_open operation to once at the beginning while
>>>    port creation. Work-queue initialization is an unnecessary operation
>>>    for every 'ifup' operation. However we have some mode-specific work-queues
>>>    and mode can change anytime after port creation. So the second patch is
>>>    to ensure the correct work-handler is called based on the mode.
>>>
>>>(b) Third patch is simple and straightforward that removes hard-coded value
>>>    that was added into the initial commit and replaces it with the default
>>>    value configured.
>>>
>>>(c) The final patch in the series removes the unimplemented "port-moved" state
>>>    from the LACP state machine. This state is defined but never set so
>>>    removing from the state machine logic makes code little cleaner.
>>>
>>>Note: None of these patches are making any functional changes.
>>>
>>>Mahesh Bandewar (4):
>>
>> Mahesh. I understand that you are still using bonding. What's stopping
>> you from using team instead?
>>
>Let me just say this, if it was trivial enough, we'd have done with it
>by now. :)

What exactly is the blocker? Can I help?