From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] color: use "light" colors for dark background Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:22:13 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20170224.112213.886902897151369899.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20170224101312.31538-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20170224.102817.1987967741498252394.davem@davemloft.net> <1487952702.30601.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: pvorel@suse.cz, netdev@vger.kernel.org, m.nyman@iki.fi, yegorslists@googlemail.com To: johannes@sipsolutions.net Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:37252 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750995AbdBXQci (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:32:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1487952702.30601.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Johannes Berg Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:11:42 +0100 > >> > Chosen colors are questionable. Best solution would be also allow >> user to >> > redefine colors, like ls does with LS_COLORS or grep with >> GREP_COLORS. But that >> > is maybe overkill. >> >> I think you may have posted this to the wrong mailing list. > > Actually, it seems to just be missing the "iproute" (or so) prefix? Ok that makes more sense :)