From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Vorel Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] color: use "light" colors for dark background Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 09:57:45 +0100 Message-ID: <20170227085745.oee6pvidb7j52cmm@dell5510> References: <20170224101312.31538-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20170225172958.GA26279@iki.fi> Reply-To: Petr Vorel Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Yegor Yefremov , Stephen Hemminger To: Mathias Nyman Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43122 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751625AbdB0JQi (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2017 04:16:38 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170225172958.GA26279@iki.fi> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, > Yea, I admit, the original color palette is kind of horrendous. I > wouldn't say the current colors are suitable for a light background > either. > I propose you just replace the current colors with their bold > variants, and leave the background hue guessing out all together. That > would be an all-round improvement for everyone. Well, I agree that original colors aren't the best ones for a light background either, but not all bold variants are suitable for light background - yellow, white and cyan are problematic at least on some terminals with light background (e.g. konsole; white isn't used). So I'd really keep separate sets of colors. > I'll include some comments on this patch-set anyway, as I had a look > at it. Thanks for your review, I'll post fixed version with two sets of colors. Kind regards, Petr